From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>, broonie@kernel.org
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, vkoul@kernel.org,
yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com,
shumingf@realtek.com, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ASoC: SDCA: Add basic system suspend support
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 18:23:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <720ffab9-1c09-433a-b3a0-40ed496119fb@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218113520.1287693-3-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
> +static int class_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sdca_class_drv *drv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + disable_irq(drv->sdw->irq);
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to force suspend: %d\n", ret);
suggestion: since this is going to be fairly generic code used by multiple devices, it'd be useful to add a device identifier or string to the error log, no?
This can be done later in a follow-up patch if agreed.
> + if (drv->suspended) {
> + sdca_irq_enable_early(drv->function, drv->core->irq_info);
> + sdca_irq_enable(drv->function, drv->core->irq_info);
maybe add a comment on why the two calls are done sequentially. You did mention it somewhere, it'd be good to capture the design.
looks good otherwise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-06 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 11:35 [PATCH v2 0/4] SDCA System Suspend Support Charles Keepax
2025-12-18 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ASoC: SDCA: Add SDCA IRQ enable/disable helpers Charles Keepax
2026-01-06 17:17 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2026-01-07 10:02 ` Charles Keepax
2025-12-18 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ASoC: SDCA: Add basic system suspend support Charles Keepax
2026-01-06 17:23 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2026-01-07 10:04 ` Charles Keepax
2026-01-08 10:18 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2026-01-08 10:40 ` Charles Keepax
2026-01-08 15:15 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2025-12-18 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ASoC: SDCA: Device boot into the system suspend process Charles Keepax
2025-12-18 11:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ASoC: SDCA: Add lock to serialise the Function initialisation Charles Keepax
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=720ffab9-1c09-433a-b3a0-40ed496119fb@linux.dev \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shumingf@realtek.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox