From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, <broonie@kernel.org>,
<lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs42l43: Move shutter IRQ handling into a worker thread
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 21:30:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ikwo9etj.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZqfHC7IodobTlVT4@opensource.cirrus.com>
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 18:44:59 +0200,
Charles Keepax wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 06:18:50PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 17:59:32 +0200,
> > Charles Keepax wrote:
> > >
> > > The microphone/speaker privacy shutter ALSA control handlers need to
> > > call pm_runtime_resume, since the hardware needs to be powered up to
> > > check the hardware state of the shutter. The IRQ handler for the
> > > shutters also needs to notify the ALSA control to inform user-space
> > > the shutters updated. However this leads to a mutex inversion, between
> > > the sdw_dev_lock and the controls_rwsem.
> >
> > That's bad, how does the mutex inversion look like? Generally
> > speaking, a call of snd_ctl_notify() from an irq handler is a very
> > standard procedure, and it should work without too much workaround.
> >
>
> SoundWire IRQs are called under the sdw_dev_lock, and then in the
> IRQ handler we call snd_ctl_notify which takes controls_rwsem.
snd_ctl_notify() doesn't take rwsem but ctl_files_rwlock.
And rwlock isn't taken except for two cases, at a list traverse at
enumerating from user-space and at the device disconnection, so it
shouldn't race. Anything missing there...?
thanks,
Takashi
> On
> the other side, in the ALSA control handler which is obviously
> called under the controls_rwsem, we do a pm_runtime_resume, which
> causes SoundWire stuff to happen that takes the sdw_dev_lock.
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-29 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 15:59 [PATCH] ASoC: cs42l43: Move shutter IRQ handling into a worker thread Charles Keepax
2024-07-29 16:18 ` Takashi Iwai
2024-07-29 16:44 ` Charles Keepax
2024-07-29 19:30 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2024-07-30 8:43 ` Charles Keepax
2024-07-30 12:33 ` Takashi Iwai
2024-07-30 14:13 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2024-07-30 14:27 ` Takashi Iwai
2024-07-30 14:44 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-30 21:47 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2024-07-30 23:20 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-31 6:30 ` Takashi Iwai
2024-07-31 8:49 ` Charles Keepax
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ikwo9etj.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox