* Re: good (and free) mp3 encoders?
1999-05-21 0:52 good (and free) mp3 encoders? qozmo x xx
@ 1999-05-22 0:18 ` 17.cV.478H
1999-05-22 6:08 ` Michael Stutz
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: 17.cV.478H @ 1999-05-22 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sound
Bladeenc:
http://home.swipnet.se/~w-82625/
encoder:
ftp://wopr.campus.luth.se:/pub/mpeg_layer_3/
or go to www.mp3.com, -> software-encoders-linux, there re listed a few
more ..
On Thu, 20 May 1999, qozmo x xx wrote:
-|hey, can anybody point me toward a good, free mp3 encoder for
-|linux that is not a trial version??
-|thanx in advance,
-|qozmo
-|___________________________________________________________________
-|You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
-|Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
-|or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
-|
|-|-|-|-|-|-|
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: good (and free) mp3 encoders?
1999-05-21 0:52 good (and free) mp3 encoders? qozmo x xx
1999-05-22 0:18 ` 17.cV.478H
@ 1999-05-22 6:08 ` Michael Stutz
1999-05-22 20:47 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Michael Stutz @ 1999-05-22 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sound
On Thu, 20 May 1999, qozmo x xx wrote:
> hey, can anybody point me toward a good, free mp3 encoder for
> linux that is not a trial version??
IIRC there can't be an mp3 encoder that is free software because of patent
problems; I seem to have heard of recent changes in the patent ownership but
I don't think that the situation has changed. So if we want a free mp3
encoder, we will have to either convince the patent holders that this is
okay, or design a replacement format that we can use with free software
(this is actually an item on the GNU Task List, but I don't think that
anyone is working on it yet).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: good (and free) mp3 encoders?
1999-05-21 0:52 good (and free) mp3 encoders? qozmo x xx
1999-05-22 0:18 ` 17.cV.478H
1999-05-22 6:08 ` Michael Stutz
@ 1999-05-22 20:47 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
1999-05-23 8:31 ` donthomp
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Erik de Castro Lopo @ 1999-05-22 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sound
qozmo x xx wrote:
>
> hey, can anybody point me toward a good, free mp3 encoder for
> linux that is not a trial version??
> thanx in advance,
> qozmo
LAME is very good.
http://www.uq.net.au/~zzmcheng/
Erik
--
+-------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo erikd@zip.com.au
+-------------------------------------------------+
Complex problems have simple easy to understand wrong answers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: good (and free) mp3 encoders?
1999-05-21 0:52 good (and free) mp3 encoders? qozmo x xx
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
1999-05-22 20:47 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
@ 1999-05-23 8:31 ` donthomp
1999-05-24 15:58 ` Michael Hoefling
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: donthomp @ 1999-05-23 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sound
I like blade encoder. Its not open source, but its free. Its fast, and
from what I can tell makes a good encode. Its a huge improvement over
l3enc 2.72 which I was using b4 blade. I believe you should be able to
find it at www.linuxberg.com
-Donald Thompson
On Thu, 20 May 1999, qozmo x xx wrote:
> hey, can anybody point me toward a good, free mp3 encoder for
> linux that is not a trial version??
> thanx in advance,
> qozmo
> ___________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
> or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: good (and free) mp3 encoders?
1999-05-21 0:52 good (and free) mp3 encoders? qozmo x xx
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
1999-05-23 8:31 ` donthomp
@ 1999-05-24 15:58 ` Michael Hoefling
1999-05-24 16:02 ` Keith Duthie
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Michael Hoefling @ 1999-05-24 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sound
Michael Stutz wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 May 1999, qozmo x xx wrote:
>
> > hey, can anybody point me toward a good, free mp3 encoder for
> > linux that is not a trial version??
>
> IIRC there can't be an mp3 encoder that is free software because of patent
> problems; I seem to have heard of recent changes in the patent ownership but
> I don't think that the situation has changed. So if we want a free mp3
> encoder, we will have to either convince the patent holders that this is
> okay, or design a replacement format that we can use with free software
> (this is actually an item on the GNU Task List, but I don't think that
> anyone is working on it yet).
There IS an free mp3 player for linux!!!!
It´s called FREEAMP!!
I use it!!!
It´s on the SuSE 6.1 cds!!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: good (and free) mp3 encoders?
1999-05-21 0:52 good (and free) mp3 encoders? qozmo x xx
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
1999-05-24 15:58 ` Michael Hoefling
@ 1999-05-24 16:02 ` Keith Duthie
1999-05-24 16:13 ` Michael Stutz
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Keith Duthie @ 1999-05-24 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sound
On Sat, 22 May 1999, Michael Stutz wrote:
> IIRC there can't be an mp3 encoder that is free software because of patent
> problems; I seem to have heard of recent changes in the patent ownership but
> I don't think that the situation has changed. So if we want a free mp3
> encoder, we will have to either convince the patent holders that this is
> okay, or design a replacement format that we can use with free software
> (this is actually an item on the GNU Task List, but I don't think that
> anyone is working on it yet).
Not entirely true. Bladeenc is going to be released with source[1] if and
when some patent issues are dealt with. These patent issues are very
strange. Apparently software can't be patented is Sweden, but the mp3 guys
have a software patent in Sweden. Look at the bladeenc site
http://www.bladeenc.cjb.net for more details.
[1] apparently it will not be LGPLed as the author originally intended due
to the patent
--
Understanding is a three edged sword. Do you *want* to get the point?
http://www.albatross.co.nz/~psycho/ O-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: good (and free) mp3 encoders?
1999-05-21 0:52 good (and free) mp3 encoders? qozmo x xx
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
1999-05-24 16:02 ` Keith Duthie
@ 1999-05-24 16:13 ` Michael Stutz
1999-05-24 18:04 ` Dan Hollis
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Michael Stutz @ 1999-05-24 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sound
On Tue, 25 May 1999, Keith Duthie wrote:
> Bladeenc is going to be released with source[1] if and when some patent
> issues are dealt with.
Do you know when this might happen, and if the source code will be open
source/free software when it is released? Unless I missed it, the Bladeenc
site doesn't seem to mention anything about this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: good (and free) mp3 encoders?
1999-05-21 0:52 good (and free) mp3 encoders? qozmo x xx
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
1999-05-24 16:13 ` Michael Stutz
@ 1999-05-24 18:04 ` Dan Hollis
1999-05-24 18:19 ` Michael Stutz
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Dan Hollis @ 1999-05-24 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sound
On Sat, 22 May 1999, Michael Stutz wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 1999, qozmo x xx wrote:
> > hey, can anybody point me toward a good, free mp3 encoder for
> > linux that is not a trial version??
> IIRC there can't be an mp3 encoder that is free software because of patent
> problems;
Wrong. There are countries where they (rightly) do not recognize patents
on algorithms. One of the free mp3 encoders was written there, where
Fraunhofer cannot touch them.
-Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: good (and free) mp3 encoders?
1999-05-21 0:52 good (and free) mp3 encoders? qozmo x xx
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
1999-05-24 18:04 ` Dan Hollis
@ 1999-05-24 18:19 ` Michael Stutz
1999-05-25 3:33 ` Keith Duthie
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Michael Stutz @ 1999-05-24 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sound
On Mon, 24 May 1999, Dan Hollis wrote:
> There are countries where they (rightly) do not recognize patents
> on algorithms. One of the free mp3 encoders was written there, where
> Fraunhofer cannot touch them.
Which encoder is that?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: good (and free) mp3 encoders?
1999-05-21 0:52 good (and free) mp3 encoders? qozmo x xx
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
1999-05-24 18:19 ` Michael Stutz
@ 1999-05-25 3:33 ` Keith Duthie
1999-05-26 22:12 ` flatmax
1999-05-27 3:15 ` Deirdre Saoirse
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Keith Duthie @ 1999-05-25 3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sound
On Mon, 24 May 1999, Michael Stutz wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 1999, Keith Duthie wrote:
>
> > Bladeenc is going to be released with source[1] if and when some patent
> > issues are dealt with.
>
> Do you know when this might happen, and if the source code will be open
> source/free software when it is released? Unless I missed it, the Bladeenc
> site doesn't seem to mention anything about this.
Apparently it's just waiting on the patent issues. The source will be
available under a Free license (although I think the reason he can't do
GPL or LGPL is because of patents). Read the site I mentioned for more
details. Under news in the bladeenc section. It's a long section.
--
Understanding is a three edged sword. Do you *want* to get the point?
http://www.albatross.co.nz/~psycho/ O-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: good (and free) mp3 encoders?
1999-05-21 0:52 good (and free) mp3 encoders? qozmo x xx
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
1999-05-25 3:33 ` Keith Duthie
@ 1999-05-26 22:12 ` flatmax
1999-05-27 3:15 ` Deirdre Saoirse
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: flatmax @ 1999-05-26 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sound
On Mon, 24 May 1999, Michael Stutz wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 1999, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > There are countries where they (rightly) do not recognize patents
> > on algorithms. One of the free mp3 encoders was written there, where
> > Fraunhofer cannot touch them.
>
> Which encoder is that?
As I understand it, if patents are not filed within the countries which
code the mp3 codecs, then there are no patents to recognise !
Often this would be countries which will result in sales which are to few
to warrent the cost of the patenting process.
Matt
__________
reverse ...
backwards needs forwards
want backwards - first go forwards
viva
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: good (and free) mp3 encoders?
1999-05-21 0:52 good (and free) mp3 encoders? qozmo x xx
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
1999-05-26 22:12 ` flatmax
@ 1999-05-27 3:15 ` Deirdre Saoirse
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Deirdre Saoirse @ 1999-05-27 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sound
On Mon, 24 May 1999, Michael Hoefling wrote:
> There IS an free mp3 player for linux!!!!
> It´s called FREEAMP!!
> I use it!!!
> It´s on the SuSE 6.1 cds!!
Well, the problem is that most of the mp3 players aren't distributed as
source, thus if you have odd hardware (I have MOSTLY odd hardware) they
won't run. I use mpg123 myself.
_Deirdre * http://www.linuxcabal.org * http://www.deirdre.net
"Perl is just not the answer to all problems. If all you have is a hammer,
the whole world looks like your thumb." George Bonser on Python
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread