From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] add testcases for duplicated warning about invalid types
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 13:17:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180202121735.39621-2-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180202121735.39621-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Once a invalid type is present in some sub-expression,
every upper level of the expression has an invalid type
but we should only warn about the innermost/root error.
However, this is not currently the case and invalid types
can create duplicated warnings, sometimes even a succession
of such warning.
Add some testcases to catch such situations.
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
---
validation/bad-type-twice0.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
validation/bad-type-twice1.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
validation/bad-type-twice2.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 validation/bad-type-twice0.c
create mode 100644 validation/bad-type-twice1.c
create mode 100644 validation/bad-type-twice2.c
diff --git a/validation/bad-type-twice0.c b/validation/bad-type-twice0.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2dbc91b03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/bad-type-twice0.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+static int foo(a)
+{
+ return a ? : 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: bad-type-twice0
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ *
+ * check-error-start
+bad-type-twice0.c:3:16: error: incorrect type in conditional
+bad-type-twice0.c:3:16: got incomplete type a
+ * check-error-end
+ */
diff --git a/validation/bad-type-twice1.c b/validation/bad-type-twice1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2f4e2838f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/bad-type-twice1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+static unsigned long foo(unsigned long val, void *ref)
+{
+ if (val >= ref)
+ val = 0;
+ return val;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: bad-type-twice1
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ *
+ * check-error-start
+bad-type-twice1.c:3:17: error: incompatible types for operation (>=)
+bad-type-twice1.c:3:17: left side has type unsigned long [unsigned] val
+bad-type-twice1.c:3:17: right side has type void *ref
+ * check-error-end
+ */
diff --git a/validation/bad-type-twice2.c b/validation/bad-type-twice2.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..916e82028
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/bad-type-twice2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+extern type_t fun(int);
+
+int foo(int x, int y)
+{
+ return ((int)fun(y)) + x;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: bad-type-twice2
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ *
+ * check-error-start
+bad-type-twice2.c:1:8: warning: 'type_t' has implicit type
+bad-type-twice2.c:1:15: error: Expected ; at end of declaration
+bad-type-twice2.c:1:15: error: got fun
+bad-type-twice2.c:5:22: error: undefined identifier 'fun'
+bad-type-twice2.c:5:18: error: cast from unknown type
+ * check-error-end
+ */
--
2.16.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-02 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-02 12:17 [PATCH 0/8] avoid duplicated warnings Luc Van Oostenryck
2018-02-02 12:17 ` Luc Van Oostenryck [this message]
2018-02-02 12:17 ` [PATCH 2/8] fix error in bad conditional Luc Van Oostenryck
2018-02-02 12:17 ` [PATCH 3/8] early return if null ctype in evaluate_conditional() Luc Van Oostenryck
2018-02-10 19:28 ` Christopher Li
2018-02-10 19:43 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2018-02-02 12:17 ` [PATCH 4/8] add helper: valid_type() Luc Van Oostenryck
2018-02-10 19:38 ` Christopher Li
2018-02-10 19:51 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2018-02-02 12:17 ` [PATCH 5/8] use valid_type to avoid to warn twice on conditionals Luc Van Oostenryck
2018-02-02 12:17 ` [PATCH 6/8] add helpers: valid_expr_type() & valid_subexpr_type() Luc Van Oostenryck
2018-02-02 12:17 ` [PATCH 7/8] do not report bad types twice Luc Van Oostenryck
2018-02-02 12:17 ` [PATCH 8/8] always evaluate both operands Luc Van Oostenryck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180202121735.39621-2-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--to=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox