* [PATCH] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix missing bitfield include
@ 2025-02-06 21:55 David Lechner
2025-02-07 13:36 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Lechner @ 2025-02-06 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown; +Cc: linux-spi, linux-kernel, David Lechner, kernel test robot
Fix missing linux/bitfield.h include needed for FIELD_GET macro.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502031224.wvHipe06-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502031250.64gElGDs-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
---
Hi Mark,
I know you prefer patches like this to fix something in a patch that has
already been applied, but it doesn't look like you actually picked up the
offending commit[1] yet in your main tree, so I don't have a commit hash
for a proper Fixes: tag.
Do you want a fix like this or should I send a v8 with the fix squashed?
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20250113-dlech-mainline-spi-engine-offload-2-v7-7-e0860c81caae@baylibre.com/
---
drivers/spi/spi-axi-spi-engine.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-axi-spi-engine.c b/drivers/spi/spi-axi-spi-engine.c
index dd6077d3ff7b..da9840957778 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-axi-spi-engine.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-axi-spi-engine.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
* Author: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
*/
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix missing bitfield include
2025-02-06 21:55 [PATCH] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix missing bitfield include David Lechner
@ 2025-02-07 13:36 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-02-07 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Lechner; +Cc: linux-spi, linux-kernel, kernel test robot
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 777 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:55:13PM -0600, David Lechner wrote:
> Fix missing linux/bitfield.h include needed for FIELD_GET macro.
This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
> I know you prefer patches like this to fix something in a patch that has
> already been applied, but it doesn't look like you actually picked up the
> offending commit[1] yet in your main tree, so I don't have a commit hash
> for a proper Fixes: tag.
> Do you want a fix like this or should I send a v8 with the fix squashed?
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20250113-dlech-mainline-spi-engine-offload-2-v7-7-e0860c81caae@baylibre.com/
I haven't applied that because of all the build issues that the bots
reported, you need to send a new version that build cleanly.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-07 13:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-06 21:55 [PATCH] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix missing bitfield include David Lechner
2025-02-07 13:36 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox