[PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up

[PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up

[Ravi Kumar kairi]

From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>

minor typo fix and cleanup

Ravi Kumar Kairi (3):
  staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo
  staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code
  staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if
    statement

 .../gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c      | 19 ++-----------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

-- 
2.48.1

[PATCH v5 1/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo

[Ravi Kumar kairi]

From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>

from havn't -> haven't

Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
index 5c62ec24fc..5a74a22015 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_read(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size_
 	writeb(DIRECTION_GPIB_TO_HOST, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
 	if (retval < 0)
 		return retval;
-	// read last bytes if we havn't received an END yet
+	// read last bytes if we haven't received an END yet
 	if (*end == 0) {
 		size_t num_bytes;
 		// try to make sure we holdoff after last byte read
-- 
2.48.1

Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:20:48AM +0530, Ravi Kumar kairi wrote:
> From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
> 
> from havn't -> haven't
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> index 5c62ec24fc..5a74a22015 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_read(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size_
>  	writeb(DIRECTION_GPIB_TO_HOST, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
>  	if (retval < 0)
>  		return retval;
> -	// read last bytes if we havn't received an END yet
> +	// read last bytes if we haven't received an END yet
>  	if (*end == 0) {
>  		size_t num_bytes;
>  		// try to make sure we holdoff after last byte read
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
  needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

[PATCH v5 2/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code

[Ravi Kumar kairi]

From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>

cleaned code that was commented out and cleaned blank line that resulted
from cleaning out commented code

Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
---
 .../staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c   | 14 --------------
 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
index 5a74a22015..af1bf6e893 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
@@ -176,8 +176,6 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
 
 	event_status = read_and_clear_event_status(board);
 
-	//pr_info("ag_ac_wr: event status 0x%x tms state 0x%lx\n", event_status, tms_priv->state);
-
 #ifdef EXPERIMENTAL
 	pr_info("ag_ac_wr: wait for previous BO to complete if any\n");
 	retval = wait_event_interruptible(board->wait,
@@ -190,14 +188,11 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
 		return retval;
 #endif
 
-	//pr_info("ag_ac_wr: sending first byte\n");
 	retval = agilent_82350b_write(board, buffer, 1, 0, &num_bytes);
 	*bytes_written += num_bytes;
 	if (retval < 0)
 		return retval;
 
-	//pr_info("ag_ac_wr: %ld bytes eoi %d tms state 0x%lx\n",length, send_eoi, tms_priv->state);
-
 	write_byte(tms_priv, tms_priv->imr0_bits & ~HR_BOIE, IMR0);
 	for (i = 1; i < fifotransferlength;) {
 		clear_bit(WRITE_READY_BN, &tms_priv->state);
@@ -210,12 +205,8 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
 		}
 		writeb(ENABLE_TI_TO_SRAM, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
 
-		//pr_info("ag_ac_wr: send block: %d bytes tms 0x%lx\n", block_size,
-		// tms_priv->state);
-
 		if (agilent_82350b_fifo_is_halted(a_priv)) {
 			writeb(RESTART_STREAM_BIT, a_priv->gpib_base + STREAM_STATUS_REG);
-			//	pr_info("ag_ac_wr: needed restart\n");
 		}
 
 		retval = wait_event_interruptible(board->wait,
@@ -226,7 +217,6 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
 						  test_bit(TIMO_NUM, &board->status));
 		writeb(0, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
 		num_bytes = block_size - read_transfer_counter(a_priv);
-		//pr_info("ag_ac_wr: sent  %ld bytes tms 0x%lx\n", num_bytes, tms_priv->state);
 
 		*bytes_written += num_bytes;
 		retval = translate_wait_return_value(board, retval);
@@ -238,9 +228,6 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
 		return retval;
 
 	if (send_eoi) {
-		//pr_info("ag_ac_wr: sending last byte with eoi byte no:   %d\n",
-		// fifotransferlength+1);
-
 		retval = agilent_82350b_write(board, buffer + fifotransferlength, 1, send_eoi,
 					      &num_bytes);
 		*bytes_written += num_bytes;
@@ -284,7 +271,6 @@ static irqreturn_t agilent_82350b_interrupt(int irq, void *arg)
 		tms9914_interrupt_have_status(board, &a_priv->tms9914_priv, tms9914_status1,
 					      tms9914_status2);
 	}
-//pr_info("event_status=0x%x s1 %x s2 %x\n", event_status,tms9914_status1,tms9914_status2);
 //write-clear status bits
 	if (event_status & (BUFFER_END_STATUS_BIT | TERM_COUNT_STATUS_BIT)) {
 		writeb(event_status & (BUFFER_END_STATUS_BIT | TERM_COUNT_STATUS_BIT),
-- 
2.48.1

Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:20:49AM +0530, Ravi Kumar kairi wrote:
> From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
> 
> cleaned code that was commented out and cleaned blank line that resulted
> from cleaning out commented code
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c   | 14 --------------
>  1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> index 5a74a22015..af1bf6e893 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> @@ -176,8 +176,6 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
>  
>  	event_status = read_and_clear_event_status(board);
>  
> -	//pr_info("ag_ac_wr: event status 0x%x tms state 0x%lx\n", event_status, tms_priv->state);
> -
>  #ifdef EXPERIMENTAL
>  	pr_info("ag_ac_wr: wait for previous BO to complete if any\n");
>  	retval = wait_event_interruptible(board->wait,
> @@ -190,14 +188,11 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
>  		return retval;
>  #endif
>  
> -	//pr_info("ag_ac_wr: sending first byte\n");
>  	retval = agilent_82350b_write(board, buffer, 1, 0, &num_bytes);
>  	*bytes_written += num_bytes;
>  	if (retval < 0)
>  		return retval;
>  
> -	//pr_info("ag_ac_wr: %ld bytes eoi %d tms state 0x%lx\n",length, send_eoi, tms_priv->state);
> -
>  	write_byte(tms_priv, tms_priv->imr0_bits & ~HR_BOIE, IMR0);
>  	for (i = 1; i < fifotransferlength;) {
>  		clear_bit(WRITE_READY_BN, &tms_priv->state);
> @@ -210,12 +205,8 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
>  		}
>  		writeb(ENABLE_TI_TO_SRAM, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
>  
> -		//pr_info("ag_ac_wr: send block: %d bytes tms 0x%lx\n", block_size,
> -		// tms_priv->state);
> -
>  		if (agilent_82350b_fifo_is_halted(a_priv)) {
>  			writeb(RESTART_STREAM_BIT, a_priv->gpib_base + STREAM_STATUS_REG);
> -			//	pr_info("ag_ac_wr: needed restart\n");
>  		}
>  
>  		retval = wait_event_interruptible(board->wait,
> @@ -226,7 +217,6 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
>  						  test_bit(TIMO_NUM, &board->status));
>  		writeb(0, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
>  		num_bytes = block_size - read_transfer_counter(a_priv);
> -		//pr_info("ag_ac_wr: sent  %ld bytes tms 0x%lx\n", num_bytes, tms_priv->state);
>  
>  		*bytes_written += num_bytes;
>  		retval = translate_wait_return_value(board, retval);
> @@ -238,9 +228,6 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
>  		return retval;
>  
>  	if (send_eoi) {
> -		//pr_info("ag_ac_wr: sending last byte with eoi byte no:   %d\n",
> -		// fifotransferlength+1);
> -
>  		retval = agilent_82350b_write(board, buffer + fifotransferlength, 1, send_eoi,
>  					      &num_bytes);
>  		*bytes_written += num_bytes;
> @@ -284,7 +271,6 @@ static irqreturn_t agilent_82350b_interrupt(int irq, void *arg)
>  		tms9914_interrupt_have_status(board, &a_priv->tms9914_priv, tms9914_status1,
>  					      tms9914_status2);
>  	}
> -//pr_info("event_status=0x%x s1 %x s2 %x\n", event_status,tms9914_status1,tms9914_status2);
>  //write-clear status bits
>  	if (event_status & (BUFFER_END_STATUS_BIT | TERM_COUNT_STATUS_BIT)) {
>  		writeb(event_status & (BUFFER_END_STATUS_BIT | TERM_COUNT_STATUS_BIT),
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 
>


Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
  needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

[PATCH v5 3/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if statement

[Ravi Kumar kairi]

From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>

removed brances from a single line od 'if' block

Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
index af1bf6e893..0c07745649 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
@@ -205,9 +205,8 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
 		}
 		writeb(ENABLE_TI_TO_SRAM, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
 
-		if (agilent_82350b_fifo_is_halted(a_priv)) {
+		if (agilent_82350b_fifo_is_halted(a_priv))
 			writeb(RESTART_STREAM_BIT, a_priv->gpib_base + STREAM_STATUS_REG);
-		}
 
 		retval = wait_event_interruptible(board->wait,
 						  ((event_status =
-- 
2.48.1

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if statement

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:20:50AM +0530, Ravi Kumar kairi wrote:
> From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
> 
> removed brances from a single line od 'if' block
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> index af1bf6e893..0c07745649 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> @@ -205,9 +205,8 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
>  		}
>  		writeb(ENABLE_TI_TO_SRAM, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
>  
> -		if (agilent_82350b_fifo_is_halted(a_priv)) {
> +		if (agilent_82350b_fifo_is_halted(a_priv))
>  			writeb(RESTART_STREAM_BIT, a_priv->gpib_base + STREAM_STATUS_REG);
> -		}
>  
>  		retval = wait_event_interruptible(board->wait,
>  						  ((event_status =
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 
> 


Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
  needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up

[Dan Carpenter]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:20:47AM +0530, Ravi Kumar kairi wrote:
> From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
> 
> minor typo fix and cleanup
> 
> Ravi Kumar Kairi (3):
>   staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo
>   staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code
>   staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if
>     statement

Thanks.

Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>

regards,
dan carpenter

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up

[Ravi Kumar Kairi]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 10:48:03AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:20:47AM +0530, Ravi Kumar kairi wrote:
> > From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
> > 
> > minor typo fix and cleanup
> > 
> > Ravi Kumar Kairi (3):
> >   staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo
> >   staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code
> >   staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if
> >     statement
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
hi, thanks for the review and would you also mind checking out 
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/eb8368ee9fff0076ea1f97d154ff2b07d2fec572.1739794938.git.kumarkairiravi@gmail.com/T/#u
In case it was marked as spam by gmail please let me know so I can send
resend.

regrads. 
Ravi