* [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up
@ 2025-02-17 19:50 Ravi Kumar kairi
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo Ravi Kumar kairi
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Kumar kairi @ 2025-02-17 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dpenkler
Cc: gregkh, kuba, dan.carpenter, rmk+kernel, linux-staging,
linux-kernel, Ravi Kumar Kairi
From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
minor typo fix and cleanup
Ravi Kumar Kairi (3):
staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo
staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code
staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if
statement
.../gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c | 19 ++-----------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 1/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo
2025-02-17 19:50 [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up Ravi Kumar kairi
@ 2025-02-17 19:50 ` Ravi Kumar kairi
2025-02-18 7:51 ` Greg KH
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code Ravi Kumar kairi
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Kumar kairi @ 2025-02-17 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dpenkler
Cc: gregkh, kuba, dan.carpenter, rmk+kernel, linux-staging,
linux-kernel, Ravi Kumar Kairi
From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
from havn't -> haven't
Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
index 5c62ec24fc..5a74a22015 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_read(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size_
writeb(DIRECTION_GPIB_TO_HOST, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
if (retval < 0)
return retval;
- // read last bytes if we havn't received an END yet
+ // read last bytes if we haven't received an END yet
if (*end == 0) {
size_t num_bytes;
// try to make sure we holdoff after last byte read
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 2/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code
2025-02-17 19:50 [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up Ravi Kumar kairi
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo Ravi Kumar kairi
@ 2025-02-17 19:50 ` Ravi Kumar kairi
2025-02-18 7:51 ` Greg KH
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if statement Ravi Kumar kairi
2025-02-18 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up Dan Carpenter
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Kumar kairi @ 2025-02-17 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dpenkler
Cc: gregkh, kuba, dan.carpenter, rmk+kernel, linux-staging,
linux-kernel, Ravi Kumar Kairi
From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
cleaned code that was commented out and cleaned blank line that resulted
from cleaning out commented code
Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
---
.../staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c | 14 --------------
1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
index 5a74a22015..af1bf6e893 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
@@ -176,8 +176,6 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
event_status = read_and_clear_event_status(board);
- //pr_info("ag_ac_wr: event status 0x%x tms state 0x%lx\n", event_status, tms_priv->state);
-
#ifdef EXPERIMENTAL
pr_info("ag_ac_wr: wait for previous BO to complete if any\n");
retval = wait_event_interruptible(board->wait,
@@ -190,14 +188,11 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
return retval;
#endif
- //pr_info("ag_ac_wr: sending first byte\n");
retval = agilent_82350b_write(board, buffer, 1, 0, &num_bytes);
*bytes_written += num_bytes;
if (retval < 0)
return retval;
- //pr_info("ag_ac_wr: %ld bytes eoi %d tms state 0x%lx\n",length, send_eoi, tms_priv->state);
-
write_byte(tms_priv, tms_priv->imr0_bits & ~HR_BOIE, IMR0);
for (i = 1; i < fifotransferlength;) {
clear_bit(WRITE_READY_BN, &tms_priv->state);
@@ -210,12 +205,8 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
}
writeb(ENABLE_TI_TO_SRAM, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
- //pr_info("ag_ac_wr: send block: %d bytes tms 0x%lx\n", block_size,
- // tms_priv->state);
-
if (agilent_82350b_fifo_is_halted(a_priv)) {
writeb(RESTART_STREAM_BIT, a_priv->gpib_base + STREAM_STATUS_REG);
- // pr_info("ag_ac_wr: needed restart\n");
}
retval = wait_event_interruptible(board->wait,
@@ -226,7 +217,6 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
test_bit(TIMO_NUM, &board->status));
writeb(0, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
num_bytes = block_size - read_transfer_counter(a_priv);
- //pr_info("ag_ac_wr: sent %ld bytes tms 0x%lx\n", num_bytes, tms_priv->state);
*bytes_written += num_bytes;
retval = translate_wait_return_value(board, retval);
@@ -238,9 +228,6 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
return retval;
if (send_eoi) {
- //pr_info("ag_ac_wr: sending last byte with eoi byte no: %d\n",
- // fifotransferlength+1);
-
retval = agilent_82350b_write(board, buffer + fifotransferlength, 1, send_eoi,
&num_bytes);
*bytes_written += num_bytes;
@@ -284,7 +271,6 @@ static irqreturn_t agilent_82350b_interrupt(int irq, void *arg)
tms9914_interrupt_have_status(board, &a_priv->tms9914_priv, tms9914_status1,
tms9914_status2);
}
-//pr_info("event_status=0x%x s1 %x s2 %x\n", event_status,tms9914_status1,tms9914_status2);
//write-clear status bits
if (event_status & (BUFFER_END_STATUS_BIT | TERM_COUNT_STATUS_BIT)) {
writeb(event_status & (BUFFER_END_STATUS_BIT | TERM_COUNT_STATUS_BIT),
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 3/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if statement
2025-02-17 19:50 [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up Ravi Kumar kairi
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo Ravi Kumar kairi
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code Ravi Kumar kairi
@ 2025-02-17 19:50 ` Ravi Kumar kairi
2025-02-18 7:52 ` Greg KH
2025-02-18 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up Dan Carpenter
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Kumar kairi @ 2025-02-17 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dpenkler
Cc: gregkh, kuba, dan.carpenter, rmk+kernel, linux-staging,
linux-kernel, Ravi Kumar Kairi
From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
removed brances from a single line od 'if' block
Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
index af1bf6e893..0c07745649 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
@@ -205,9 +205,8 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
}
writeb(ENABLE_TI_TO_SRAM, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
- if (agilent_82350b_fifo_is_halted(a_priv)) {
+ if (agilent_82350b_fifo_is_halted(a_priv))
writeb(RESTART_STREAM_BIT, a_priv->gpib_base + STREAM_STATUS_REG);
- }
retval = wait_event_interruptible(board->wait,
((event_status =
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up
2025-02-17 19:50 [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up Ravi Kumar kairi
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if statement Ravi Kumar kairi
@ 2025-02-18 7:48 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-02-18 11:56 ` Ravi Kumar Kairi
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2025-02-18 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ravi Kumar kairi
Cc: dpenkler, gregkh, kuba, rmk+kernel, linux-staging, linux-kernel
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:20:47AM +0530, Ravi Kumar kairi wrote:
> From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
>
> minor typo fix and cleanup
>
> Ravi Kumar Kairi (3):
> staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo
> staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code
> staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if
> statement
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo Ravi Kumar kairi
@ 2025-02-18 7:51 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2025-02-18 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ravi Kumar kairi
Cc: dpenkler, kuba, dan.carpenter, rmk+kernel, linux-staging,
linux-kernel
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:20:48AM +0530, Ravi Kumar kairi wrote:
> From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
>
> from havn't -> haven't
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> index 5c62ec24fc..5a74a22015 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_read(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size_
> writeb(DIRECTION_GPIB_TO_HOST, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
> if (retval < 0)
> return retval;
> - // read last bytes if we havn't received an END yet
> + // read last bytes if we haven't received an END yet
> if (*end == 0) {
> size_t num_bytes;
> // try to make sure we holdoff after last byte read
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
needs to be done here to properly describe this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code Ravi Kumar kairi
@ 2025-02-18 7:51 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2025-02-18 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ravi Kumar kairi
Cc: dpenkler, kuba, dan.carpenter, rmk+kernel, linux-staging,
linux-kernel
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:20:49AM +0530, Ravi Kumar kairi wrote:
> From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
>
> cleaned code that was commented out and cleaned blank line that resulted
> from cleaning out commented code
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c | 14 --------------
> 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> index 5a74a22015..af1bf6e893 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> @@ -176,8 +176,6 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
>
> event_status = read_and_clear_event_status(board);
>
> - //pr_info("ag_ac_wr: event status 0x%x tms state 0x%lx\n", event_status, tms_priv->state);
> -
> #ifdef EXPERIMENTAL
> pr_info("ag_ac_wr: wait for previous BO to complete if any\n");
> retval = wait_event_interruptible(board->wait,
> @@ -190,14 +188,11 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
> return retval;
> #endif
>
> - //pr_info("ag_ac_wr: sending first byte\n");
> retval = agilent_82350b_write(board, buffer, 1, 0, &num_bytes);
> *bytes_written += num_bytes;
> if (retval < 0)
> return retval;
>
> - //pr_info("ag_ac_wr: %ld bytes eoi %d tms state 0x%lx\n",length, send_eoi, tms_priv->state);
> -
> write_byte(tms_priv, tms_priv->imr0_bits & ~HR_BOIE, IMR0);
> for (i = 1; i < fifotransferlength;) {
> clear_bit(WRITE_READY_BN, &tms_priv->state);
> @@ -210,12 +205,8 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
> }
> writeb(ENABLE_TI_TO_SRAM, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
>
> - //pr_info("ag_ac_wr: send block: %d bytes tms 0x%lx\n", block_size,
> - // tms_priv->state);
> -
> if (agilent_82350b_fifo_is_halted(a_priv)) {
> writeb(RESTART_STREAM_BIT, a_priv->gpib_base + STREAM_STATUS_REG);
> - // pr_info("ag_ac_wr: needed restart\n");
> }
>
> retval = wait_event_interruptible(board->wait,
> @@ -226,7 +217,6 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
> test_bit(TIMO_NUM, &board->status));
> writeb(0, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
> num_bytes = block_size - read_transfer_counter(a_priv);
> - //pr_info("ag_ac_wr: sent %ld bytes tms 0x%lx\n", num_bytes, tms_priv->state);
>
> *bytes_written += num_bytes;
> retval = translate_wait_return_value(board, retval);
> @@ -238,9 +228,6 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
> return retval;
>
> if (send_eoi) {
> - //pr_info("ag_ac_wr: sending last byte with eoi byte no: %d\n",
> - // fifotransferlength+1);
> -
> retval = agilent_82350b_write(board, buffer + fifotransferlength, 1, send_eoi,
> &num_bytes);
> *bytes_written += num_bytes;
> @@ -284,7 +271,6 @@ static irqreturn_t agilent_82350b_interrupt(int irq, void *arg)
> tms9914_interrupt_have_status(board, &a_priv->tms9914_priv, tms9914_status1,
> tms9914_status2);
> }
> -//pr_info("event_status=0x%x s1 %x s2 %x\n", event_status,tms9914_status1,tms9914_status2);
> //write-clear status bits
> if (event_status & (BUFFER_END_STATUS_BIT | TERM_COUNT_STATUS_BIT)) {
> writeb(event_status & (BUFFER_END_STATUS_BIT | TERM_COUNT_STATUS_BIT),
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
needs to be done here to properly describe this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if statement
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if statement Ravi Kumar kairi
@ 2025-02-18 7:52 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2025-02-18 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ravi Kumar kairi
Cc: dpenkler, kuba, dan.carpenter, rmk+kernel, linux-staging,
linux-kernel
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:20:50AM +0530, Ravi Kumar kairi wrote:
> From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
>
> removed brances from a single line od 'if' block
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> index af1bf6e893..0c07745649 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/agilent_82350b/agilent_82350b.c
> @@ -205,9 +205,8 @@ static int agilent_82350b_accel_write(gpib_board_t *board, uint8_t *buffer, size
> }
> writeb(ENABLE_TI_TO_SRAM, a_priv->gpib_base + SRAM_ACCESS_CONTROL_REG);
>
> - if (agilent_82350b_fifo_is_halted(a_priv)) {
> + if (agilent_82350b_fifo_is_halted(a_priv))
> writeb(RESTART_STREAM_BIT, a_priv->gpib_base + STREAM_STATUS_REG);
> - }
>
> retval = wait_event_interruptible(board->wait,
> ((event_status =
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
needs to be done here to properly describe this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up
2025-02-18 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up Dan Carpenter
@ 2025-02-18 11:56 ` Ravi Kumar Kairi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Kumar Kairi @ 2025-02-18 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: dpenkler, gregkh, kuba, rmk+kernel, linux-staging, linux-kernel
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 10:48:03AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:20:47AM +0530, Ravi Kumar kairi wrote:
> > From: Ravi Kumar Kairi <kumarkairiravi@gmail.com>
> >
> > minor typo fix and cleanup
> >
> > Ravi Kumar Kairi (3):
> > staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo
> > staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code
> > staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if
> > statement
>
> Thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
hi, thanks for the review and would you also mind checking out
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/eb8368ee9fff0076ea1f97d154ff2b07d2fec572.1739794938.git.kumarkairiravi@gmail.com/T/#u
In case it was marked as spam by gmail please let me know so I can send
resend.
regrads.
Ravi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-18 11:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-17 19:50 [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up Ravi Kumar kairi
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: fixed a typo Ravi Kumar kairi
2025-02-18 7:51 ` Greg KH
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: cleaned commented out code Ravi Kumar kairi
2025-02-18 7:51 ` Greg KH
2025-02-17 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] staging:gpib:agilent_82350b.c: removed braces from a single if statement Ravi Kumar kairi
2025-02-18 7:52 ` Greg KH
2025-02-18 7:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] staging:gpib: typo fix and cleam up Dan Carpenter
2025-02-18 11:56 ` Ravi Kumar Kairi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox