From: "Juan José Arboleda" <soyjuanarbol@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: pure.logic@nexus-software.ie, johan@kernel.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, trivial@kernel.org,
greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Enclose multi-statement macro in do-while loop
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 03:28:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZpeAsakTE0ZL90kt@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024071739-mollusk-uneaten-8dec@gregkh>
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:50:52AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:58:34AM -0500, Juan José Arboleda wrote:
> > The macro `gb_loopback_stats_attrs` in the Greybus loopback driver
> > contains multiple statements, which should be enclosed in a do-while
> > loop to ensure proper execution and adhere to coding standards.
> >
> > This patch modifies the `gb_loopback_stats_attrs` macro to enclose
> > its statements in a do-while loop, addressing the style error flagged
> > by checkpatch.pl.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Juan José Arboleda <soyjuanarbol@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
> > index 4313d3bbc23a..a97de86c67a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
> > @@ -163,9 +163,11 @@ static ssize_t name##_avg_show(struct device *dev, \
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name##_avg)
> >
> > #define gb_loopback_stats_attrs(field) \
> > - gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u); \
> > - gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u); \
> > - gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field)
> > + do { \
> > + gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u); \
> > + gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u); \
> > + gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field); \
> > + } while (0)
> >
> > #define gb_loopback_attr(field, type) \
> > static ssize_t field##_show(struct device *dev, \
>
> Are you sure you test-built this change?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Yes! I build and clean and build and clean and build again, everything seems
fine from the compiler side and posttest task as well. Everything seems ok.
Thanks,
- Juan José
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-17 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-17 6:58 [PATCH] staging: greybus: Enclose multi-statement macro in do-while loop Juan José Arboleda
2024-07-17 7:50 ` Greg KH
2024-07-17 8:28 ` Juan José Arboleda [this message]
2024-07-17 8:45 ` Greg KH
2024-07-18 3:32 ` [PATCH v2] staging: greybus: break multi statement macro into multiple lines Juan José Arboleda
2024-07-18 4:35 ` Greg KH
2024-07-18 4:47 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZpeAsakTE0ZL90kt@fedora \
--to=soyjuanarbol@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox