From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Mohammad Amin Hosseini <moahmmad.hosseinii@gmail.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
jic23@kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com,
dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: iio: adc: ad7816: add mutex to serialize SPI/GPIO operations
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 15:40:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLWULUIcYEz3N-Rx@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aLV0LBxD0KIHPSmo@stanley.mountain>
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 01:23:40PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 10:24:45AM +0330, Mohammad Amin Hosseini wrote:
> > From: mohammad amin hosseini <moahmmad.hosseinii@gmail.com>
> >
> > The ad7816 driver was accessing SPI and GPIO lines without
> > synchronization, which could lead to race conditions when accessed
> > concurrently from multiple contexts. This might result in corrupted
> > readings or inconsistent GPIO states.
> >
> > Introduce an io_lock mutex in the driver structure to serialize:
> > - SPI transactions in ad7816_spi_read() and ad7816_spi_write()
> > - GPIO pin toggling sequences
> > - Updates to device state via sysfs store functions (mode, channel, oti)
> >
> > The mutex ensures proper mutual exclusion and prevents race
> > conditions under concurrent access.
...
> > + mutex_lock(&chip->io_lock);
> > chip->channel_id = data;
> > + mutex_unlock(&chip->io_lock);
> > + mutex_lock(&chip->io_lock);
> > chip->oti_data[chip->channel_id] = data;
> > + mutex_unlock(&chip->io_lock);
> I'm not really knowledgeable to review the others, if they are
> required or how the locking is supposed to work. But these aren't
> correct because we're only locking around the writers and not the
> readers so it could still race.
Readers are in spi_write(), or what do you imply by this comment?
I.o.w. I do not see the issue with the idea of locking and how it's
done (I haven't checked all of the details, though).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-01 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-01 6:54 [PATCH v2] staging: iio: adc: ad7816: add mutex to serialize SPI/GPIO operations Mohammad Amin Hosseini
2025-09-01 7:10 ` Greg KH
2025-09-01 10:23 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-09-01 12:40 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-09-01 12:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-09-01 13:08 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLWULUIcYEz3N-Rx@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=moahmmad.hosseinii@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox