[PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Replace comparison to false with !

[PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Replace comparison to false with !

[Mariyam Shahid]

Replace comparisons to false with their logical negation
to fix checkpatch warnings.

Signed-off-by: Mariyam Shahid <mariyam.shahid135@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
index ebe73abab892..0192543cdec0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
@@ -1013,10 +1013,10 @@ int rtw_check_beacon_data(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pbuf,  int len)
 
 		rtw_ht_use_default_setting(padapter);
 
-		if (pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_20m == false)
+		if (!pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_20m)
 			pht_cap->cap_info &= cpu_to_le16(~(IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_20));
 
-		if (pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_40m == false)
+		if (!pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_40m)
 			pht_cap->cap_info &= cpu_to_le16(~(IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_40));
 
 		if (!TEST_FLAG(pmlmepriv->htpriv.ldpc_cap, LDPC_HT_ENABLE_RX))
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Replace comparison to false with !

[Ethan Tidmore]

On Mon Feb 23, 2026 at 11:07 AM CST, Mariyam Shahid wrote:
> Replace comparisons to false with their logical negation
> to fix checkpatch warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mariyam Shahid <mariyam.shahid135@gmail.com>
> ---

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Ethan Tidmore <ethantidmore06@gmail.com>

Thanks,

ET

Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Replace comparison to false with !

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 10:07:07PM +0500, Mariyam Shahid wrote:
> Replace comparisons to false with their logical negation
> to fix checkpatch warnings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mariyam Shahid <mariyam.shahid135@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> index ebe73abab892..0192543cdec0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> @@ -1013,10 +1013,10 @@ int rtw_check_beacon_data(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pbuf,  int len)
>  
>  		rtw_ht_use_default_setting(padapter);
>  
> -		if (pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_20m == false)
> +		if (!pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_20m)
>  			pht_cap->cap_info &= cpu_to_le16(~(IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_20));
>  
> -		if (pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_40m == false)
> +		if (!pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_40m)
>  			pht_cap->cap_info &= cpu_to_le16(~(IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_40));
>  
>  		if (!TEST_FLAG(pmlmepriv->htpriv.ldpc_cap, LDPC_HT_ENABLE_RX))
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

This doesn't apply to my tree as someone else sent this change before
you and I applied it, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Replace comparison to false with !

[Mariyam Shahid]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 11:11 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 10:07:07PM +0500, Mariyam Shahid wrote:
> > Replace comparisons to false with their logical negation
> > to fix checkpatch warnings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mariyam Shahid <mariyam.shahid135@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> > index ebe73abab892..0192543cdec0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> > @@ -1013,10 +1013,10 @@ int rtw_check_beacon_data(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pbuf,  int len)
> >
> >               rtw_ht_use_default_setting(padapter);
> >
> > -             if (pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_20m == false)
> > +             if (!pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_20m)
> >                       pht_cap->cap_info &= cpu_to_le16(~(IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_20));
> >
> > -             if (pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_40m == false)
> > +             if (!pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_40m)
> >                       pht_cap->cap_info &= cpu_to_le16(~(IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_40));
> >
> >               if (!TEST_FLAG(pmlmepriv->htpriv.ldpc_cap, LDPC_HT_ENABLE_RX))
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
>
> This doesn't apply to my tree as someone else sent this change before
> you and I applied it, sorry.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

Understood, thanks for letting me know.

Could you advise which tree I should be basing my staging patches on
to avoid conflicts like this? I had been using the staging-next tree,
but it seems changes accepted there aren't always reflected when
someone else sends a similar patch first.

Should I be checking linux-next before submitting to make sure a fix
hasn't already been applied or queued elsewhere?

Thanks,
Mariyam

Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Replace comparison to false with !

[Dan Carpenter]

On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 02:13:49PM +0500, Mariyam Shahid wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 11:11 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 10:07:07PM +0500, Mariyam Shahid wrote:
> > > Replace comparisons to false with their logical negation
> > > to fix checkpatch warnings.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mariyam Shahid <mariyam.shahid135@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> > > index ebe73abab892..0192543cdec0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> > > @@ -1013,10 +1013,10 @@ int rtw_check_beacon_data(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pbuf,  int len)
> > >
> > >               rtw_ht_use_default_setting(padapter);
> > >
> > > -             if (pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_20m == false)
> > > +             if (!pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_20m)
> > >                       pht_cap->cap_info &= cpu_to_le16(~(IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_20));
> > >
> > > -             if (pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_40m == false)
> > > +             if (!pmlmepriv->htpriv.sgi_40m)
> > >                       pht_cap->cap_info &= cpu_to_le16(~(IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SGI_40));
> > >
> > >               if (!TEST_FLAG(pmlmepriv->htpriv.ldpc_cap, LDPC_HT_ENABLE_RX))
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
> >
> > This doesn't apply to my tree as someone else sent this change before
> > you and I applied it, sorry.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Understood, thanks for letting me know.
> 
> Could you advise which tree I should be basing my staging patches on
> to avoid conflicts like this? I had been using the staging-next tree,
> but it seems changes accepted there aren't always reflected when
> someone else sends a similar patch first.
> 
> Should I be checking linux-next before submitting to make sure a fix
> hasn't already been applied or queued elsewhere?

Work against staging-next.

The other patch was probably sitting on the mailing list when you sent
yours.  It's not a big deal.

regards,
dan carpenter