Re: (subset) [PATCH v3] mfd: axp20x: AXP717: Fix missing IRQ status registers range

Re: (subset) [PATCH v3] mfd: axp20x: AXP717: Fix missing IRQ status registers range

[Lee Jones]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 00:31:04 +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> While we list the "IRQ status *and acknowledge*" registers as volatile
> in the MFD description, they are missing from the writable range array,
> so acknowledging any interrupts was met with an -EIO error.
> This error propagates up, leading to the whole AXP717 driver failing to
> probe, which is fatal to most systems using this PMIC, since most
> peripherals refer one of the PMIC voltage rails.
> This wasn't noticed on the initial submission, since the interrupt was
> completely missing at this point, but the DTs now merged describe the
> interrupt, creating the problem.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] mfd: axp20x: AXP717: Fix missing IRQ status registers range
      commit: 569c5136baf12c3b8dd137ac356f2a7ceb38bdb5

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

Re: (subset) [PATCH v3] mfd: axp20x: AXP717: Fix missing IRQ status registers range

[Philippe Simons]

Tested on my RG35XX-H, v6.10rc3 boots with the patch applied

Tested-by: Philippe Simons <simons.philippe@gmail.com>

Re: (subset) [PATCH v3] mfd: axp20x: AXP717: Fix missing IRQ status registers range

[Lee Jones]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2024, Philippe Simons wrote:

> Tested on my RG35XX-H, v6.10rc3 boots with the patch applied
> 
> Tested-by: Philippe Simons <simons.philippe@gmail.com>

It looks like the way you replied to this mail failed to attach itself
to the original thread, so I have no idea what this tag applies to.

However this point may be moot since, by the look of the subject line,
you're attempting to apply tags to patches which have already been
committed.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]