* Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/480] 6.15.10-rc1 review [not found] <20250812174357.281828096@linuxfoundation.org> @ 2025-08-13 15:48 ` Jon Hunter 2025-08-13 17:25 ` Jon Hunter 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-08-13 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, linux-tegra, stable On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release. > There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Failures detected for Tegra ... Test results for stable-v6.15: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 120 tests: 119 pass, 1 fail Linux version: 6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04 Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py Jon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* (no subject) 2025-08-13 15:48 ` [PATCH 6.15 000/480] 6.15.10-rc1 review Jon Hunter @ 2025-08-13 17:25 ` Jon Hunter 2025-08-13 22:07 ` [PATCH 6.15 000/480] 6.15.10-rc1 review Ron Economos 2025-08-14 15:36 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-08-13 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jonathanh Cc: achill, akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, gregkh, hargar, linux-kernel, linux-tegra, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="y", Size: 1971 bytes --] From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 18:18:01 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/480] 6.15.10-rc1 review X-NVConfidentiality: public On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release. > > There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Failures detected for Tegra ... > > Test results for stable-v6.15: > 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail > 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail > 120 tests: 119 pass, 1 fail > > Linux version: 6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34 > Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, > tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000, > tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, > tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, > tegra30-cardhu-a04 > > Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y … WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much I believe that this is introduced by … Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/ Jon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/480] 6.15.10-rc1 review 2025-08-13 17:25 ` Jon Hunter @ 2025-08-13 22:07 ` Ron Economos 2025-08-14 15:36 ` Greg KH 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Ron Economos @ 2025-08-13 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jon Hunter Cc: achill, akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, gregkh, hargar, linux-kernel, linux-tegra, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds On 8/13/25 10:25, Jon Hunter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release. >>> There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz >>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >> Failures detected for Tegra ... >> >> Test results for stable-v6.15: >> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail >> 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail >> 120 tests: 119 pass, 1 fail >> >> Linux version: 6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34 >> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, >> tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000, >> tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, >> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, >> tegra30-cardhu-a04 >> >> Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py > I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y … > > WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much > > I believe that this is introduced by … > > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling > > This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/ > > Jon Seeing this kernel warning on RISC-V also. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2025-08-13 17:25 ` Jon Hunter 2025-08-13 22:07 ` [PATCH 6.15 000/480] 6.15.10-rc1 review Ron Economos @ 2025-08-14 15:36 ` Greg KH 2025-08-15 16:20 ` Re: Jon Hunter 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2025-08-14 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jon Hunter Cc: achill, akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, linux-kernel, linux-tegra, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 06:25:32PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release. > > > There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > Failures detected for Tegra ... > > > > Test results for stable-v6.15: > > 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail > > 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail > > 120 tests: 119 pass, 1 fail > > > > Linux version: 6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34 > > Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, > > tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000, > > tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, > > tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, > > tegra30-cardhu-a04 > > > > Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py > > I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y … > > WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much > > I believe that this is introduced by … > > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling > > This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/ I've now dropped this. Is that causing the test failure for you? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2025-08-14 15:36 ` Greg KH @ 2025-08-15 16:20 ` Jon Hunter 2025-08-15 16:53 ` Re: Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-08-15 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH Cc: achill, akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, linux-kernel, linux-tegra, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds On 14/08/2025 16:36, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 06:25:32PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release. >>>> There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>> let me know. >>>> >>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000. >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>> >>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz >>>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y >>>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> >>>> greg k-h >>> >>> Failures detected for Tegra ... >>> >>> Test results for stable-v6.15: >>> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail >>> 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail >>> 120 tests: 119 pass, 1 fail >>> >>> Linux version: 6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34 >>> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, >>> tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000, >>> tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, >>> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, >>> tegra30-cardhu-a04 >>> >>> Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py >> >> I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y … >> >> WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much >> >> I believe that this is introduced by … >> >> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> >> sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling >> >> This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/ > > I've now dropped this. > > Is that causing the test failure for you? Yes that is causing the test failure. Thanks! Jon -- nvpublic ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2025-08-15 16:20 ` Re: Jon Hunter @ 2025-08-15 16:53 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2025-08-15 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jon Hunter Cc: achill, akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, linux-kernel, linux-tegra, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 05:20:34PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 14/08/2025 16:36, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 06:25:32PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote: > > > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release. > > > > > There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000. > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz > > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y > > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > > Failures detected for Tegra ... > > > > > > > > Test results for stable-v6.15: > > > > 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail > > > > 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail > > > > 120 tests: 119 pass, 1 fail > > > > > > > > Linux version: 6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34 > > > > Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, > > > > tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000, > > > > tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, > > > > tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, > > > > tegra30-cardhu-a04 > > > > > > > > Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py > > > > > > I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y … > > > > > > WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much > > > > > > I believe that this is introduced by … > > > > > > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > > > sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling > > > > > > This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > I've now dropped this. > > > > Is that causing the test failure for you? > > Yes that is causing the test failure. Thanks! Is the test just noticing the warning message? Or is it a functional failure? Does it also fail on Linus's tree? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-15 16:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20250812174357.281828096@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-08-13 15:48 ` [PATCH 6.15 000/480] 6.15.10-rc1 review Jon Hunter
2025-08-13 17:25 ` Jon Hunter
2025-08-13 22:07 ` [PATCH 6.15 000/480] 6.15.10-rc1 review Ron Economos
2025-08-14 15:36 ` Greg KH
2025-08-15 16:20 ` Re: Jon Hunter
2025-08-15 16:53 ` Re: Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox