Re:

Re:

[Mark Reyes Guus]

Good day. I am Mark Reyes Guus, I work with Abn Amro Bank as an auditor. I have a proposition to discuss with you. Should you be interested, please e-mail back to me.

Private Email: markreyesguus-cUNmAtK3PYUqdlJmJB21zg@public.gmane.org OR markguus.reyes01-/k+kKI0dE6M@public.gmane.org

Yours Sincerely,
Mark Reyes Guus.

Re:

[Quan Han]

Hello,

Compliments of the day to you and I believe all is well. My name is Mr. Quan Han and I work in bank of china. I have a transaction that I believe will be of mutual benefits to both of us. It involves an investment portfolio worth(eight million,three hundred and seventy thousand USD) which I like to acquire with your help and assistance. 
Yours sincerely,
Quan Han.

RE:

[Qin's Yanjun]

How are you today and your family? I require your attention and honest
co-operation about some issues which i will really want to discuss with you
which.  Looking forward to read from you soon.  

Qin's


______________________________

Sky Silk, http://aknet.kz

Re:

[Amos Kalonzo]

Attn:

I am wondering why You haven't respond to my email for some days now.
reference to my client's contract balance payment of (11.7M,USD)
Kindly get back to me for more details.

Best Regards

Amos Kalonzo

Re:

[Ben Dooks]

On 29/01/2020 00:17, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 28.01.2020 21:19, Jon Hunter пишет:
>>
>> On 28/01/2020 17:42, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> 28.01.2020 15:13, Mark Brown пишет:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:20:25PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> 24.01.2020 19:50, Jon Hunter пишет:
>>>>
>>>>>>                  .rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_96000,
>>>>>>                  .formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S32_LE |
>>>>>> -                          SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE |
>>>>>> +                          SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_3LE |
>>>>
>>>>> It should solve the problem in my particular case, but I'm not sure that
>>>>> the solution is correct.
>>>>
>>>> If the format implemented by the driver is S24_3LE the driver should
>>>> advertise S24_3LE.
>>>
>>> It should be S24_LE, but seems we still don't know for sure.
>>
>> Why?
> /I think/ sound should be much more distorted if it was S24_3LE, but
> maybe I'm wrong.

S24_3LE is IICC the wrong thing and we can't support it on the tegra3


-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius

https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html

Re:

[Francois Pinault]

A donation was made in your favour by Francois Pinault, reply for more details.

Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/480] 6.15.10-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release.
> There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Failures detected for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.15:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    120 tests:	119 pass, 1 fail

Linux version:	6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
                tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
                tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
                tegra30-cardhu-a04

Test failures:	tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py


Jon

(no subject)

[Jon Hunter]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="y", Size: 1971 bytes --]

From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 18:18:01 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/480] 6.15.10-rc1 review
X-NVConfidentiality: public

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release.
> > There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Failures detected for Tegra ...
> 
> Test results for stable-v6.15:
>     10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
>     28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
>     120 tests:	119 pass, 1 fail
> 
> Linux version:	6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34
> Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>                 tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
>                 tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
>                 tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
>                 tegra30-cardhu-a04
> 
> Test failures:	tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py

I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y …

 WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much

I believe that this is introduced by …

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
    sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling

This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/

Jon

Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/480] 6.15.10-rc1 review

[Ron Economos]

On 8/13/25 10:25, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release.
>>> There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>>
>> Test results for stable-v6.15:
>>      10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
>>      28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
>>      120 tests:	119 pass, 1 fail
>>
>> Linux version:	6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34
>> Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>>                  tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
>>                  tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
>>                  tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
>>                  tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>
>> Test failures:	tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
> I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y …
>
>   WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much
>
> I believe that this is introduced by …
>
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>      sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling
>
> This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Jon

Seeing this kernel warning on RISC-V also.

Re:

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 06:25:32PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release.
> > > There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > Failures detected for Tegra ...
> > 
> > Test results for stable-v6.15:
> >     10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
> >     28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
> >     120 tests:	119 pass, 1 fail
> > 
> > Linux version:	6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34
> > Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> >                 tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
> >                 tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> >                 tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
> >                 tegra30-cardhu-a04
> > 
> > Test failures:	tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
> 
> I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y …
> 
>  WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much
> 
> I believe that this is introduced by …
> 
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>     sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling
> 
> This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/

I've now dropped this.

Is that causing the test failure for you?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re:

[Jon Hunter]

On 14/08/2025 16:36, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 06:25:32PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release.
>>>> There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz
>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>>>
>>> Test results for stable-v6.15:
>>>      10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
>>>      28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
>>>      120 tests:	119 pass, 1 fail
>>>
>>> Linux version:	6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34
>>> Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>>>                  tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
>>>                  tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
>>>                  tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
>>>                  tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>>
>>> Test failures:	tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
>>
>> I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y …
>>
>>   WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much
>>
>> I believe that this is introduced by …
>>
>> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>>      sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling
>>
>> This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> I've now dropped this.
> 
> Is that causing the test failure for you?

Yes that is causing the test failure. Thanks!

Jon

-- 
nvpublic

Re:

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 05:20:34PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 14/08/2025 16:36, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 06:25:32PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:28AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 19:43:28 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.10 release.
> > > > > There are 480 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > let me know.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:42:20 +0000.
> > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.15.10-rc1.gz
> > > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.15.y
> > > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > > 
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > > 
> > > > > greg k-h
> > > > 
> > > > Failures detected for Tegra ...
> > > > 
> > > > Test results for stable-v6.15:
> > > >      10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
> > > >      28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
> > > >      120 tests:	119 pass, 1 fail
> > > > 
> > > > Linux version:	6.15.10-rc1-g2510f67e2e34
> > > > Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> > > >                  tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
> > > >                  tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> > > >                  tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
> > > >                  tegra30-cardhu-a04
> > > > 
> > > > Test failures:	tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
> > > 
> > > I am seeing the following kernel warning for both linux-6.15.y and linux-6.16.y …
> > > 
> > >   WARNING KERN sched: DL replenish lagged too much
> > > 
> > > I believe that this is introduced by …
> > > 
> > > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > >      sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling
> > > 
> > > This has been reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdXn4z1pioTtBGMfQM0jsLviqS2jwysaWXpoLxWYoGa82w@mail.gmail.com/
> > 
> > I've now dropped this.
> > 
> > Is that causing the test failure for you?
> 
> Yes that is causing the test failure. Thanks!

Is the test just noticing the warning message?  Or is it a functional
failure?  Does it also fail on Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h