Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] rv/rtapp: Add wakeup monitor

[Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>]

On Wed, 2026-07-22 at 09:42 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> Chao Liu <chao.liu@processmission.com> writes:
> > > +static void handle_sched_waking(void *data, struct task_struct *task)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (in_task()) {
> > > +		if (current->prio > task->prio)
> > > +			ltl_atom_pulse(task, LTL_WOKEN_BY_LOWER_PRIO,
> > > true);
> > 
> > The implementation also reports wakeups from softirq context through
> > WOKEN_BY_SOFTIRQ:
> > 
> > > +	} else if (in_serving_softirq()) {
> > > +		ltl_atom_pulse(task, LTL_WOKEN_BY_SOFTIRQ, true);
> > > +	}
> > 
> > Should this description mention softirq wakeups as well?
> 
> Technically, on RT kernel, softirq is a SCHED_OTHER task. On !RT kernel,
> softirq can also be executed as a SCHED_OTHER task, which is the cause
> for concern.
> 
> But explicitly mentioning softirq does not hurt, I wouldn't oppose that.

Sounds good to me. So as far as I understand, this change is going to go through
a separate patch right?
I'm considering this series final.

Thanks,
Gabriele