* [RFC v2 1/3] arm64: kprobes: Only handle faults originating from XOL slot
2026-07-09 14:22 [RFC v2 0/3] arm64: kprobes: Fix single-step fault and reentry handling Pu Hu
@ 2026-07-09 14:22 ` Pu Hu
2026-07-10 4:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-07-09 14:22 ` [RFC v2 2/3] arm64: kprobes: Allow reentering kprobes while single-stepping Pu Hu
2026-07-09 14:22 ` [RFC v2 3/3] arm64: kprobes: Save and restore saved_irqflag in prev_kprobe Pu Hu
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pu Hu @ 2026-07-09 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mhiramat@kernel.org
Cc: ada.coupriediaz@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, Hongyan Xia, Pu Hu, Jiazi Li,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
naveen@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com
From: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
kprobe_fault_handler() currently treats any page fault taken while in
KPROBE_HIT_SS or KPROBE_REENTER state as a kprobe single-step fault. This
assumption does not hold: perf or tracing code may run from the debug
exception path during the single-step window and take its own page fault.
When the fault is handled as a kprobe fault, the PC is rewritten to the
probe address, corrupting the exception recovery context for the real
fault. A typical reproducer is running perf with preemptirq tracepoints
and dwarf callchains while a kprobe is installed on a frequently
executed function.
Fix this in two layers:
1. At function entry, bail out immediately for simulated kprobes
(ainsn.xol_insn == NULL), since they have no XOL slot and any fault
taken during their execution cannot be a single-step fault.
2. For kprobes with an XOL slot, only handle the fault when the
faulting PC matches the XOL instruction address. Faults from any
other PC are left to the normal page fault handler.
This follows the same principle as the x86 fix in commit 6381c24cd6d5
("kprobes/x86: Fix page-fault handling logic").
Signed-off-by: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
index 43a0361a8bf0..798e4b091d1a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
@@ -282,9 +282,31 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr)
struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+ /*
+ * Simulated kprobes execute in the debug trap context and have no
+ * XOL slot. Any page fault taken while a simulated kprobe is in
+ * progress cannot have been caused by kprobe single-stepping and
+ * must be left alone for the normal page fault handler, including
+ * fixup_exception.
+ */
+ if (cur && !cur->ainsn.xol_insn)
+ return 0;
+
switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
case KPROBE_REENTER:
+ /*
+ * A page fault taken while in KPROBE_HIT_SS or
+ * KPROBE_REENTER state is only attributable to kprobe
+ * single-stepping if the faulting PC points to the
+ * current kprobe's XOL instruction. If the fault occurred
+ * elsewhere (e.g. in perf or tracing code invoked from the
+ * debug exception path), leave it for the normal page fault
+ * handler to process.
+ */
+ if (instruction_pointer(regs) != (unsigned long)cur->ainsn.xol_insn)
+ break;
+
/*
* We are here because the instruction being single
* stepped caused a page fault. We reset the current
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC v2 1/3] arm64: kprobes: Only handle faults originating from XOL slot
2026-07-09 14:22 ` [RFC v2 1/3] arm64: kprobes: Only handle faults originating from XOL slot Pu Hu
@ 2026-07-10 4:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2026-07-10 4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pu Hu
Cc: ada.coupriediaz@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, Hongyan Xia, Jiazi Li,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
naveen@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com
On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 14:22:23 +0000
Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com> wrote:
> From: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
>
> kprobe_fault_handler() currently treats any page fault taken while in
> KPROBE_HIT_SS or KPROBE_REENTER state as a kprobe single-step fault. This
> assumption does not hold: perf or tracing code may run from the debug
> exception path during the single-step window and take its own page fault.
>
> When the fault is handled as a kprobe fault, the PC is rewritten to the
> probe address, corrupting the exception recovery context for the real
> fault. A typical reproducer is running perf with preemptirq tracepoints
> and dwarf callchains while a kprobe is installed on a frequently
> executed function.
>
> Fix this in two layers:
>
> 1. At function entry, bail out immediately for simulated kprobes
> (ainsn.xol_insn == NULL), since they have no XOL slot and any fault
> taken during their execution cannot be a single-step fault.
>
> 2. For kprobes with an XOL slot, only handle the fault when the
> faulting PC matches the XOL instruction address. Faults from any
> other PC are left to the normal page fault handler.
>
> This follows the same principle as the x86 fix in commit 6381c24cd6d5
> ("kprobes/x86: Fix page-fault handling logic").
>
> Signed-off-by: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
This looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thanks,
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index 43a0361a8bf0..798e4b091d1a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -282,9 +282,31 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr)
> struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>
> + /*
> + * Simulated kprobes execute in the debug trap context and have no
> + * XOL slot. Any page fault taken while a simulated kprobe is in
> + * progress cannot have been caused by kprobe single-stepping and
> + * must be left alone for the normal page fault handler, including
> + * fixup_exception.
> + */
> + if (cur && !cur->ainsn.xol_insn)
> + return 0;
> +
> switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
> case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
> case KPROBE_REENTER:
> + /*
> + * A page fault taken while in KPROBE_HIT_SS or
> + * KPROBE_REENTER state is only attributable to kprobe
> + * single-stepping if the faulting PC points to the
> + * current kprobe's XOL instruction. If the fault occurred
> + * elsewhere (e.g. in perf or tracing code invoked from the
> + * debug exception path), leave it for the normal page fault
> + * handler to process.
> + */
> + if (instruction_pointer(regs) != (unsigned long)cur->ainsn.xol_insn)
> + break;
> +
> /*
> * We are here because the instruction being single
> * stepped caused a page fault. We reset the current
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [RFC v2 2/3] arm64: kprobes: Allow reentering kprobes while single-stepping
2026-07-09 14:22 [RFC v2 0/3] arm64: kprobes: Fix single-step fault and reentry handling Pu Hu
2026-07-09 14:22 ` [RFC v2 1/3] arm64: kprobes: Only handle faults originating from XOL slot Pu Hu
@ 2026-07-09 14:22 ` Pu Hu
2026-07-10 5:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-07-09 14:22 ` [RFC v2 3/3] arm64: kprobes: Save and restore saved_irqflag in prev_kprobe Pu Hu
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pu Hu @ 2026-07-09 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mhiramat@kernel.org
Cc: ada.coupriediaz@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, Hongyan Xia, Pu Hu, Jiazi Li,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
naveen@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com
From: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
A kprobe can be hit while another kprobe is in KPROBE_HIT_SS state. This
can happen when tracing or perf code runs from the debug exception path
while the first kprobe is preparing or executing its out-of-line
single-step instruction.
Currently arm64 treats a kprobe hit in KPROBE_HIT_SS as unrecoverable,
the same as a hit in KPROBE_REENTER. This is too strict. A hit in
KPROBE_HIT_SS is still a one-level reentry and can be handled by saving
the current kprobe state and setting up single-step for the new probe,
just like reentry from KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE or KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE.
The truly unrecoverable case is hitting another kprobe while already in
KPROBE_REENTER, because the reentry save area has already been consumed.
Move KPROBE_HIT_SS to the recoverable reentry cases and leave
KPROBE_REENTER as the unrecoverable nested reentry case.
This mirrors the x86 fix in commit 6a5022a56ac3
("kprobes/x86: Allow to handle reentered kprobe on single-stepping").
Signed-off-by: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
index 798e4b091d1a..2ca5916eca2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
@@ -240,10 +240,16 @@ static int __kprobes reenter_kprobe(struct kprobe *p,
switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
+ case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
+ /*
+ * A probe can be hit while another kprobe is preparing or
+ * executing its XOL single-step instruction. This is still a
+ * recoverable one-level reentry, so handle it in the same way as
+ * reentry from KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE or KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE.
+ */
kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 1);
break;
- case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
case KPROBE_REENTER:
pr_warn("Failed to recover from reentered kprobes.\n");
dump_kprobe(p);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC v2 2/3] arm64: kprobes: Allow reentering kprobes while single-stepping
2026-07-09 14:22 ` [RFC v2 2/3] arm64: kprobes: Allow reentering kprobes while single-stepping Pu Hu
@ 2026-07-10 5:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-07-10 6:13 ` Pu Hu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2026-07-10 5:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pu Hu
Cc: ada.coupriediaz@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, Hongyan Xia, Jiazi Li,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
naveen@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com
On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 14:22:25 +0000
Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com> wrote:
> From: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
>
> A kprobe can be hit while another kprobe is in KPROBE_HIT_SS state. This
> can happen when tracing or perf code runs from the debug exception path
> while the first kprobe is preparing or executing its out-of-line
> single-step instruction.
>
> Currently arm64 treats a kprobe hit in KPROBE_HIT_SS as unrecoverable,
> the same as a hit in KPROBE_REENTER. This is too strict. A hit in
> KPROBE_HIT_SS is still a one-level reentry and can be handled by saving
> the current kprobe state and setting up single-step for the new probe,
> just like reentry from KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE or KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE.
>
> The truly unrecoverable case is hitting another kprobe while already in
> KPROBE_REENTER, because the reentry save area has already been consumed.
>
> Move KPROBE_HIT_SS to the recoverable reentry cases and leave
> KPROBE_REENTER as the unrecoverable nested reentry case.
>
> This mirrors the x86 fix in commit 6a5022a56ac3
> ("kprobes/x86: Allow to handle reentered kprobe on single-stepping").
>
Hi, as Sashiko commented, we have to save the saved_irqflag to
prev_kprobbe.
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709142215.226872-1-hupu%40transsion.com?part=2
Thank you,
> Signed-off-by: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index 798e4b091d1a..2ca5916eca2f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -240,10 +240,16 @@ static int __kprobes reenter_kprobe(struct kprobe *p,
> switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
> case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
> case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
> + case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
> + /*
> + * A probe can be hit while another kprobe is preparing or
> + * executing its XOL single-step instruction. This is still a
> + * recoverable one-level reentry, so handle it in the same way as
> + * reentry from KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE or KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE.
> + */
> kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
> setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 1);
> break;
> - case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
> case KPROBE_REENTER:
> pr_warn("Failed to recover from reentered kprobes.\n");
> dump_kprobe(p);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC v2 2/3] arm64: kprobes: Allow reentering kprobes while single-stepping
2026-07-10 5:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
@ 2026-07-10 6:13 ` Pu Hu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pu Hu @ 2026-07-10 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
Cc: ada.coupriediaz@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, Hongyan Xia, Jiazi Li,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
naveen@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com
On 7/10/2026 1:09 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 14:22:25 +0000
> Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
>>
>> A kprobe can be hit while another kprobe is in KPROBE_HIT_SS state. This
>> can happen when tracing or perf code runs from the debug exception path
>> while the first kprobe is preparing or executing its out-of-line
>> single-step instruction.
>>
>> Currently arm64 treats a kprobe hit in KPROBE_HIT_SS as unrecoverable,
>> the same as a hit in KPROBE_REENTER. This is too strict. A hit in
>> KPROBE_HIT_SS is still a one-level reentry and can be handled by saving
>> the current kprobe state and setting up single-step for the new probe,
>> just like reentry from KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE or KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE.
>>
>> The truly unrecoverable case is hitting another kprobe while already in
>> KPROBE_REENTER, because the reentry save area has already been consumed.
>>
>> Move KPROBE_HIT_SS to the recoverable reentry cases and leave
>> KPROBE_REENTER as the unrecoverable nested reentry case.
>>
>> This mirrors the x86 fix in commit 6a5022a56ac3
>> ("kprobes/x86: Allow to handle reentered kprobe on single-stepping").
>>
>
> Hi, as Sashiko commented, we have to save the saved_irqflag to
> prev_kprobbe.
>
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709142215.226872-1-hupu%40transsion.com?part=2
>
> Thank you,
>
Hi Masami,
We already added the saved_irqflag support in Patch 3 of this series:
arm64: kprobes: Save and restore saved_irqflag in prev_kprobe
However, I see the issue. Patch 2 and Patch 3 are separate commits,
so Patch 2 alone is not bisectable. I'll prepare a v3 that folds them
together, so the reentry logic and the saved_irqflag preservation land
in a single commit.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Thanks,
Pu Hu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [RFC v2 3/3] arm64: kprobes: Save and restore saved_irqflag in prev_kprobe
2026-07-09 14:22 [RFC v2 0/3] arm64: kprobes: Fix single-step fault and reentry handling Pu Hu
2026-07-09 14:22 ` [RFC v2 1/3] arm64: kprobes: Only handle faults originating from XOL slot Pu Hu
2026-07-09 14:22 ` [RFC v2 2/3] arm64: kprobes: Allow reentering kprobes while single-stepping Pu Hu
@ 2026-07-09 14:22 ` Pu Hu
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pu Hu @ 2026-07-09 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mhiramat@kernel.org
Cc: ada.coupriediaz@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, Hongyan Xia, Pu Hu, Jiazi Li,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
naveen@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com
From: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
When a kprobe is reentered from KPROBE_HIT_SS state (allowed by the
previous patch), setup_singlestep() for the nested kprobe calls
kprobes_save_local_irqflag(), overwriting kcb->saved_irqflag with the
currently masked DAIF value. The outer kprobe's original DAIF state is
lost.
When the nested kprobe completes, restore_previous_kprobe() brings back
the outer kprobe's kp and status, but saved_irqflag still contains the
nested kprobe's value. When the outer kprobe's single-step eventually
finishes, kprobes_restore_local_irqflag() applies the wrong DAIF mask,
leaving interrupts permanently disabled.
Fix this by extending struct prev_kprobe with a saved_irqflag field, and
saving/restoring it alongside kp and status. This ensures the outer
kprobe's original interrupt state is preserved across reentry.
Signed-off-by: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h | 6 ++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
index f2782560647b..35ce2c94040e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
@@ -26,6 +26,12 @@
struct prev_kprobe {
struct kprobe *kp;
unsigned int status;
+
+ /*
+ * The original DAIF state of the outer kprobe, saved here before
+ * a nested kprobe overwrites kcb->saved_irqflag during reentry.
+ */
+ unsigned long saved_irqflag;
};
/* per-cpu kprobe control block */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
index 2ca5916eca2f..4e0efad5caf2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
@@ -174,12 +174,27 @@ static void __kprobes save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
{
kcb->prev_kprobe.kp = kprobe_running();
kcb->prev_kprobe.status = kcb->kprobe_status;
+
+ /*
+ * Save the outer kprobe's original DAIF flags before the nested
+ * kprobe calls kprobes_save_local_irqflag() and overwrites
+ * kcb->saved_irqflag. Without this, the outer kprobe will restore
+ * the wrong DAIF state and leave interrupts permanently masked.
+ */
+ kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_irqflag = kcb->saved_irqflag;
}
static void __kprobes restore_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
{
__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, kcb->prev_kprobe.kp);
kcb->kprobe_status = kcb->prev_kprobe.status;
+
+ /*
+ * Restore the outer kprobe's saved_irqflag so that when its
+ * single-step completes, kprobes_restore_local_irqflag() uses
+ * the correct original DAIF value.
+ */
+ kcb->saved_irqflag = kcb->prev_kprobe.saved_irqflag;
}
static void __kprobes set_current_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread