* [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free()
@ 2026-07-01 21:48 Steven Rostedt
2026-07-01 22:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2026-07-01 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML, Linux Trace Kernel
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, Markus Elfring
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The enable_data variable gets freed on most error paths in
event_enable_trigger_parse(). Use free() to free it and just before
returning normally, call no_free_ptr(enable_data) to keep it from being
freed.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
index 655db2e82513..fe5ca6ac7c8d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
@@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ int event_enable_trigger_parse(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
char *glob, char *cmd, char *param_and_filter)
{
struct trace_event_file *event_enable_file;
- struct enable_trigger_data *enable_data;
+ struct enable_trigger_data *enable_data __free(kfree) = NULL;
struct event_trigger_data *trigger_data;
struct trace_array *tr = file->tr;
char *param, *filter;
@@ -1789,17 +1789,13 @@ int event_enable_trigger_parse(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
enable_data->file = event_enable_file;
trigger_data = trigger_data_alloc(cmd_ops, cmd, param, enable_data);
- if (!trigger_data) {
- kfree(enable_data);
+ if (!trigger_data)
return ret;
- }
if (remove) {
event_trigger_unregister(cmd_ops, file, glob+1, trigger_data);
kfree(trigger_data);
- kfree(enable_data);
- ret = 0;
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
/* Up the trigger_data count to make sure nothing frees it on failure */
@@ -1829,6 +1825,7 @@ int event_enable_trigger_parse(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
goto out_disable;
event_trigger_free(trigger_data);
+ no_free_ptr(enable_data);
return ret;
out_disable:
trace_event_enable_disable(event_enable_file, 0, 1);
@@ -1837,7 +1834,6 @@ int event_enable_trigger_parse(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
out_free:
event_trigger_reset_filter(cmd_ops, trigger_data);
event_trigger_free(trigger_data);
- kfree(enable_data);
return ret;
}
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free()
2026-07-01 21:48 [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free() Steven Rostedt
@ 2026-07-01 22:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-07-02 9:58 ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-02 11:58 ` [PATCH] " Markus Elfring
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2026-07-01 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt
Cc: LKML, Linux Trace Kernel, Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers,
Markus Elfring
On Wed, 1 Jul 2026 17:48:29 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> The enable_data variable gets freed on most error paths in
> event_enable_trigger_parse(). Use free() to free it and just before
> returning normally, call no_free_ptr(enable_data) to keep it from being
> freed.
>
This looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thank you,
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> index 655db2e82513..fe5ca6ac7c8d 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> @@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ int event_enable_trigger_parse(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
> char *glob, char *cmd, char *param_and_filter)
> {
> struct trace_event_file *event_enable_file;
> - struct enable_trigger_data *enable_data;
> + struct enable_trigger_data *enable_data __free(kfree) = NULL;
> struct event_trigger_data *trigger_data;
> struct trace_array *tr = file->tr;
> char *param, *filter;
> @@ -1789,17 +1789,13 @@ int event_enable_trigger_parse(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
> enable_data->file = event_enable_file;
>
> trigger_data = trigger_data_alloc(cmd_ops, cmd, param, enable_data);
> - if (!trigger_data) {
> - kfree(enable_data);
> + if (!trigger_data)
> return ret;
> - }
>
> if (remove) {
> event_trigger_unregister(cmd_ops, file, glob+1, trigger_data);
> kfree(trigger_data);
> - kfree(enable_data);
> - ret = 0;
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* Up the trigger_data count to make sure nothing frees it on failure */
> @@ -1829,6 +1825,7 @@ int event_enable_trigger_parse(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
> goto out_disable;
>
> event_trigger_free(trigger_data);
> + no_free_ptr(enable_data);
> return ret;
> out_disable:
> trace_event_enable_disable(event_enable_file, 0, 1);
> @@ -1837,7 +1834,6 @@ int event_enable_trigger_parse(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
> out_free:
> event_trigger_reset_filter(cmd_ops, trigger_data);
> event_trigger_free(trigger_data);
> - kfree(enable_data);
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.53.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free()
2026-07-01 21:48 [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free() Steven Rostedt
2026-07-01 22:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
@ 2026-07-02 9:58 ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-02 20:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-07-02 11:58 ` [PATCH] " Markus Elfring
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2026-07-02 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-trace-kernel, Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers,
Steven Rostedt
Cc: LKML
…
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> @@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ int event_enable_trigger_parse(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
> char *glob, char *cmd, char *param_and_filter)
> {
> struct trace_event_file *event_enable_file;
> - struct enable_trigger_data *enable_data;
> + struct enable_trigger_data *enable_data __free(kfree) = NULL;
…
How do you think about to reduce the scope for this local variable?
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free()
2026-07-02 9:58 ` Markus Elfring
@ 2026-07-02 20:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-07-03 5:00 ` Markus Elfring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2026-07-02 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Elfring
Cc: linux-trace-kernel, Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, LKML
On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 11:58:02 +0200
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> wrote:
> …
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> > @@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ int event_enable_trigger_parse(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
> > char *glob, char *cmd, char *param_and_filter)
> > {
> > struct trace_event_file *event_enable_file;
> > - struct enable_trigger_data *enable_data;
> > + struct enable_trigger_data *enable_data __free(kfree) = NULL;
> …
>
> How do you think about to reduce the scope for this local variable?
>
No, it's fine as is.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free()
2026-07-02 20:53 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2026-07-03 5:00 ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-03 15:42 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2026-07-03 5:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, linux-trace-kernel, kernel-janitors
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, LKML
>> …
>>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
>>> @@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ int event_enable_trigger_parse(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
>>> char *glob, char *cmd, char *param_and_filter)
>>> {
>>> struct trace_event_file *event_enable_file;
>>> - struct enable_trigger_data *enable_data;
>>> + struct enable_trigger_data *enable_data __free(kfree) = NULL;
>> …
>>
>> How do you think about to reduce the scope for this local variable?
>>
>
> No, it's fine as is.
Does this feedback mean that you disagree to an essential development requirement
according to such a programming interface?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1.2/source/include/linux/cleanup.h#L142-L153
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free()
2026-07-03 5:00 ` Markus Elfring
@ 2026-07-03 15:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-07-03 18:37 ` Markus Elfring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2026-07-03 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Elfring
Cc: linux-trace-kernel, kernel-janitors, Masami Hiramatsu,
Mathieu Desnoyers, LKML
On Fri, 3 Jul 2026 07:00:10 +0200
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> wrote:
> > No, it's fine as is.
> Does this feedback mean that you disagree to an essential development requirement
> according to such a programming interface?
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1.2/source/include/linux/cleanup.h#L142-L153
> * Given that the "__free(...) = NULL" pattern for variables defined at
> * the top of the function poses this potential interdependency problem
> * the recommendation is to always define and assign variables in one
> * statement and not group variable definitions at the top of the
> * function when __free() is used.
This is really just a guideline.
> *
> * Lastly, given that the benefit of cleanup helpers is removal of
> * "goto", and that the "goto" statement can jump between scopes, the
> * expectation is that usage of "goto" and cleanup helpers is never
> * mixed in the same function. I.e. for a given routine, convert all
> * resources that need a "goto" cleanup to scope-based cleanup, or
> * convert none of them.
The above has more to do with guard()s and not so much with a __free() at
the top of the function. The reason is because things get broken if a goto
jumps over a guard().
In other words, if you don't know what you are doing, don't mix them.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free()
2026-07-03 15:42 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2026-07-03 18:37 ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-03 19:09 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2026-07-03 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, linux-trace-kernel, kernel-janitors
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, LKML
>> * Given that the "__free(...) = NULL" pattern for variables defined at
>> * the top of the function poses this potential interdependency problem
>> * the recommendation is to always define and assign variables in one
>> * statement and not group variable definitions at the top of the
>> * function when __free() is used.
>
> This is really just a guideline.
Do any contributors care a bit more for involved technical details?
https://lore.kernel.org/arm-scmi/20251208020907.5476-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com/
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free()
2026-07-03 18:37 ` Markus Elfring
@ 2026-07-03 19:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-07-03 19:20 ` Markus Elfring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2026-07-03 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Elfring
Cc: linux-trace-kernel, kernel-janitors, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, LKML
On Fri, 3 Jul 2026 20:37:09 +0200
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> wrote:
> Do any contributors care a bit more for involved technical details?
> https://lore.kernel.org/arm-scmi/20251208020907.5476-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com/
That example uses the variable in a specific block whereas this variable is
used in most of the function, which makes it appropriate where it lies.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free()
2026-07-03 19:09 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2026-07-03 19:20 ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-03 19:33 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2026-07-03 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, linux-trace-kernel, kernel-janitors
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, LKML
> That example uses the variable in a specific block whereas this variable is
> used in most of the function, which makes it appropriate where it lies.
What does hinder you to apply scope reductions for selected local variables
more often?
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free()
2026-07-03 19:20 ` Markus Elfring
@ 2026-07-03 19:33 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2026-07-03 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Elfring
Cc: linux-trace-kernel, kernel-janitors, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, LKML
On Fri, 3 Jul 2026 21:20:46 +0200
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> wrote:
> > That example uses the variable in a specific block whereas this variable is
> > used in most of the function, which makes it appropriate where it lies.
>
> What does hinder you to apply scope reductions for selected local variables
> more often?
>
OK, now you are just talking like Eliza.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free()
2026-07-01 21:48 [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free() Steven Rostedt
2026-07-01 22:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-07-02 9:58 ` Markus Elfring
@ 2026-07-02 11:58 ` Markus Elfring
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2026-07-02 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-trace-kernel, Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers,
Steven Rostedt
Cc: LKML
> The enable_data variable gets freed on most error paths in
> event_enable_trigger_parse(). Use free() to free it and just before
> returning normally, call no_free_ptr(enable_data) to keep it from being
> freed.
The conversion is incomplete for the application of scope-based resource management so far.
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-03 19:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-01 21:48 [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup event_enable_trigger_parse() by using __free() Steven Rostedt
2026-07-01 22:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-07-02 9:58 ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-02 20:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-07-03 5:00 ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-03 15:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-07-03 18:37 ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-03 19:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-07-03 19:20 ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-03 19:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-07-02 11:58 ` [PATCH] " Markus Elfring
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox