[uml-devel] linux-2.4.23

[uml-devel] linux-2.4.23

[Patrick Kilian]

Hi,

when trying to compile linux-2.4.23 from kernel.org patched with 
uml_patch-2.4.22-uml6 I get the following error:

make all_targets
make[2]: Wechsel in das Verzeichnis Verzeichnis 
»/usr/src/linux-2.4.23-uml/fs«
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.23-uml/include -Wall 
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common  
-U__i386__ -Ui386 -DUM_FASTCALL -g -D__arch_um__ -DSUBARCH="i386" 
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.23-uml/arch/um/include 
-Derrno=kernel_errno 
-I/usr/src/linux-2.4.23-uml/arch/um/kernel/tt/include 
-I/usr/src/linux-2.4.23-uml/arch/um/kernel/skas/include   -nostdinc 
-iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=binfmt_elf  -c -o binfmt_elf.o 
binfmt_elf.c
binfmt_elf.c:806: macro `ELF_PLAT_INIT' used with too many (2) args
make[2]: *** [binfmt_elf.o] Fehler 1
make[2]: Verlassen des Verzeichnisses Verzeichnis 
»/usr/src/linux-2.4.23-uml/fs«
make[1]: *** [first_rule] Fehler 2
make[1]: Verlassen des Verzeichnisses Verzeichnis 
»/usr/src/linux-2.4.23-uml/fs«
make: *** [_dir_fs] Fehler 2

Is this a know behavourier? Is there a workaround other than to wait for 
uml_patch-2.4.23-uml1?

mfg,
Patrick "Petschge" Kilian


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1278&alloc_id371&opÌk
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] linux-2.4.23

[Steven Pritchard]

On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 07:17:05PM +0100, Patrick Kilian wrote:
> when trying to compile linux-2.4.23 from kernel.org patched with 
> uml_patch-2.4.22-uml6 I get the following error:
[...]
> binfmt_elf.c:806: macro `ELF_PLAT_INIT' used with too many (2) args

This was answered a week or two ago (by someone else).

--- include/asm-um/archparam-i386.h.orig	2003-12-06 20:36:55.000000000 -0600
+++ include/asm-um/archparam-i386.h	2003-12-06 20:51:59.000000000 -0600
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 #define ELF_DATA        ELFDATA2LSB
 #define ELF_ARCH        EM_386
 
-#define ELF_PLAT_INIT(regs) do { \
+#define ELF_PLAT_INIT(regs, load_addr) do { \
 	PT_REGS_EBX(regs) = 0; \
 	PT_REGS_ECX(regs) = 0; \
 	PT_REGS_EDX(regs) = 0; \

Steve
-- 
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve@kspei.com             http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-7360               Mobile: (618)567-7320


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] linux-2.4.23

[Henrik Nordstrom]

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Patrick Kilian wrote:

> Is this a know behavourier? Is there a workaround other than to wait for 
> uml_patch-2.4.23-uml1?

There is a workaround by making a small change in the source. See the mail 
archives about one week back I think.

Regards
Henrik



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] linux-2.4.23

[Patrick "Petschge" Kilian]

Hi,

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>> Is this a know behavourier? Is there a workaround other than to wait for
>> uml_patch-2.4.23-uml1?
> There is a workaround by making a small change in the source. See the mail
> archives about one week back I think.
Thanks alot for your and Steves help.

Does anybody know why there isn't a official uml_patch-2.4.23-uml1? 

mfg,
Patrick "Petschge" Kilian


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] linux-2.4.23

[Jeff Dike]

petschge@web.de said:
> Does anybody know why there isn't a official uml_patch-2.4.23-uml1?  

I do.

It's because I haven't had any time to put it together.  Just fix the 
ELF_PLAT_INIT thing, and you'll have pretty much what I'd release anyway.

				Jeff



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel