From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Steve Schmidtke <steve_schmidtke@hotmail.com>,
kraxel@bytesex.org, uml@uxu.ch,
mcr@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca, jdike@addtoit.com
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] RE: What to do with uml_switch?
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:35:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412062035.40672.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY24-F30259BA099D39BC383A19D83B30@phx.gbl>
On Sunday 05 December 2004 21:00, Steve Schmidtke wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> >It is apparent that something is wrong with uml_switch (though I don't
> > know the code and I'm not going to express technical opinion, only
> > "management" one).
> Yes, the fact that a core file has sat in the directory for almost 2 years
> says something. :)
> >Steve, merging at least the earlier of your patches (they are splitup The
> >Right Way(tm)) might be done soon, without lots of discussions.
> Thanks. I havn't noticed any problems with the changes I've made so far.
> >If you feel so, you might split uml_switch from the rest (but remember the
> >user point of view - two packages doubles the setup time).
> Who is this directed to? Who is the maintainer at the moment anyways?
It's (un)maintained by Jeff Dike, i.e. he's the last one updating the version
on sf.net (you might call that "official version" - but I'm against the
"official version" concept). Actually, you can guess he has no time to do
anything else than bugfixes on it. We haven't yet managed to build one single
2.4 up-to-date UML tree (i.e. with both *all* security fixes and the work
against 2.6.9 host). Currently probably the stablest version seems to be one
of the 2.6.9 incarnations (either it or -bb4).
> >If you are good guys (and you are), I think you can sort out by discussing
> >it
> >here (I'm just against the creation of a separate ML for that development
> > - things don't work that way).
> >So, the ball is over to you. In this moment, Gerd Knorr seems the one who
> >has
> >the time and the position (working in SuSE) to manage it well (he can push
> >updates to its users and so on, for instance) but it's just my little 2
> >cents.
> I'd be happy with Gerd as maintainer. I'd nominate myself, but I have no
> system that I can dedicate to the project. I also have a hard time saying
> no to interesting ideas.
Which is bad about stability... however you share that with Jeff Dike, it
seems :-)
> Steve Schmidtke
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-06 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-04 3:52 [uml-devel] What to do with uml_switch? Blaisorblade
2004-12-05 3:42 ` [uml-devel] " Michael Richardson
2004-12-06 19:25 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-12-07 16:21 ` Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-08 16:51 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-08 19:33 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-12-09 3:22 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-08 19:36 ` Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-08 21:37 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-09 0:28 ` Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-09 0:53 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-05 20:00 ` [uml-devel] " Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-06 18:30 ` [uml-devel] " Gerd Knorr
2004-12-06 19:35 ` Blaisorblade [this message]
2004-12-08 20:24 ` [uml-devel] " Felix Müri
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-05 20:20 [uml-devel] " Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-06 1:23 ` mcr
2004-12-07 16:06 ` Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-08 17:11 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-08 19:49 ` Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-08 21:41 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-14 0:36 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-12-10 18:36 ` Blaisorblade
2004-12-12 0:11 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-12 19:11 ` Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-12 20:50 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-16 18:20 ` Blaisorblade
2004-12-06 20:16 ` Blaisorblade
2004-12-08 16:42 ` Michael Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200412062035.40672.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=mcr@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca \
--cc=steve_schmidtke@hotmail.com \
--cc=uml@uxu.ch \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox