From: "Steve Schmidtke" <steve_schmidtke@hotmail.com>
To: mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca
Cc: blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it, kraxel@bytesex.org, uml@uxu.ch,
jdike@addtoit.com, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: What to do with uml_switch?
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:49:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BAY24-F3095F190F005AC385C24ED83B60@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7044.1102525892@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Michael Richardson wrote:
> Steve> Strip down the UML kernel's daemon_user.c and what you have
> Steve> is a framework to talk socket datagrams to a uml_switch. Add
>
> That's probably not the best idea. We put the interfaces in two places
>right now... Best would be if a refactored uml_switch exported an
>interface that replaced daemon_user.c :-)
It would be useful if daemon_user.c could be run in a synchronous mode such
that packets are guaranteed delivered to the switch and guaranteed delivered
to a host. The switch could then mangle packets in a deterministic fashion
for testing.
It would also be interesting if packets could be passed in shared memory.
I'm wondering if it would be faster and more reliable at the same time.
Steve Schmidtke
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-08 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-05 20:20 [uml-devel] Re: What to do with uml_switch? Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-06 1:23 ` mcr
2004-12-07 16:06 ` Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-08 17:11 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-08 19:49 ` Steve Schmidtke [this message]
2004-12-08 21:41 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-14 0:36 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-12-10 18:36 ` Blaisorblade
2004-12-12 0:11 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-12 19:11 ` Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-12 20:50 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-16 18:20 ` Blaisorblade
2004-12-06 20:16 ` Blaisorblade
2004-12-08 16:42 ` Michael Richardson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-04 3:52 [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2004-12-05 3:42 ` [uml-devel] " Michael Richardson
2004-12-06 19:25 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-12-07 16:21 ` Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-08 16:51 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-08 19:33 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-12-09 3:22 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-08 19:36 ` Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-08 21:37 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-09 0:28 ` Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-09 0:53 ` Michael Richardson
2004-12-05 20:00 ` [uml-devel] " Steve Schmidtke
2004-12-06 18:30 ` [uml-devel] " Gerd Knorr
2004-12-06 19:35 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BAY24-F3095F190F005AC385C24ED83B60@phx.gbl \
--to=steve_schmidtke@hotmail.com \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca \
--cc=uml@uxu.ch \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox