[uml-devel] RE: What to do with uml_switch?

["Steve Schmidtke" <steve_schmidtke@hotmail.com>]

Blaisorblade wrote:
>It is apparent that something is wrong with uml_switch (though I don't know
>the code and I'm not going to express technical opinion, only "management"
>one).

Yes, the fact that a core file has sat in the directory for almost 2 years 
says something. :)

>Steve, merging at least the earlier of your patches (they are splitup The
>Right Way(tm)) might be done soon, without lots of discussions.

Thanks.  I havn't noticed any problems with the changes I've made so far.

>If you feel so, you might split uml_switch from the rest (but remember the
>user point of view - two packages doubles the setup time).

Who is this directed to?  Who is the maintainer at the moment anyways?

>If you are good guys (and you are), I think you can sort out by discussing 
>it
>here (I'm just against the creation of a separate ML for that development -
>things don't work that way).
>
>So, the ball is over to you. In this moment, Gerd Knorr seems the one who 
>has
>the time and the position (working in SuSE) to manage it well (he can push
>updates to its users and so on, for instance) but it's just my little 2
>cents.

I'd be happy with Gerd as maintainer.  I'd nominate myself, but I have no 
system that I can dedicate to the project.  I also have a hard time saying 
no to interesting ideas.

Steve Schmidtke




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel