Re: [PATCH v2] um: add dummy ioremap and iounmap functions

[Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>]

Any thoughts on this? My patches for the other architectures are already
in linux-next. um is the only one that remains.

Thanks,

Logan

On 27/05/17 12:15 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 27/05/17 12:08 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Still, those code patch could be protected by #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM,
>> or better, if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM)).
> 
> Well I think it would have to be the former seeing the latter would
> still end up trying to compile the missing function. But having ifdefs
> inside code is not generally seen as good idea[1].
> 
> I'd really like to go forward with either this patch or something like
> it. The other two arches that have this problem are fine with merging a
> fix and adding ifdefs to work around a single arch doesn't feel right to me.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Logan
> 
> [1] http://yarchive.net/comp/linux/ifdefs.html
>