From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] actually useful backtrace from a CPU-chewing hang
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:59:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877iel7ljp.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> (raw)
I suspect this can go wrong anywhere, but it happens to have been a
CBQ-triggered gettimeofday() while sending an arp that did it. (My ADSL
router pretty much bombs the poor damn machine with ARP packets all the
time.)
#0 getnstimeofday (ts=0x8217d10) at include/linux/time.h:182
#1 0x080824b4 in ktime_get_ts (ts=0x8217d10) at kernel/hrtimer.c:122
#2 0x0808244b in ktime_get () at kernel/hrtimer.c:58
#3 0x08148d93 in cbq_dequeue (sch=0xdde3800) at include/net/pkt_sched.h:53
#4 0x08143355 in __qdisc_run (dev=0xded1800) at net/sched/sch_generic.c:85
#5 0x08137991 in dev_queue_xmit (skb=0xdc89380) at include/net/pkt_sched.h:89
#6 0x08185537 in arp_xmit (skb=0xdc89380) at net/ipv4/arp.c:668
#7 0x08185574 in arp_send (type=1, ptype=2054, dest_ip=3457507285, dev=0xded1800, src_ip=2668538048, dest_hw=0xdd65244 "", src_hw=0xded192c "\002`\227yâÁ", target_hw=0x0) at net/ipv4/arp.c:694
#8 0x08184fb2 in arp_solicit (neigh=0xdd65220, skb=0x0) at net/ipv4/arp.c:379
#9 0x0813c898 in neigh_timer_handler (arg=232149536) at net/core/neighbour.c:866
#10 0x08077afd in run_timer_softirq (h=0x823a3ec) at kernel/timer.c:664
#11 0x080740a4 in __do_softirq () at kernel/softirq.c:234
#12 0x0807412e in do_softirq () at kernel/softirq.c:271
#13 0x08074186 in irq_exit () at kernel/softirq.c:310
#14 0x080576fd in do_IRQ (irq=0, regs=0x8217ec4) at arch/um/kernel/irq.c:336
#15 0x080590a0 in timer_handler (sig=26, regs=0x8217ec4) at arch/um/kernel/time.c:28
#16 0x08064c84 in real_alarm_handler (sc=0x0) at arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c:93
#17 0x08064cac in alarm_handler (sig=26, sc=0x0) at arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c:108
#18 0x080654a0 in deliver_alarm () at arch/um/os-Linux/time.c:117
#19 0x08065640 in idle_sleep (nsecs=<value optimized out>) at arch/um/os-Linux/time.c:181
#20 0x080580d4 in default_idle () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:248
#21 0x080580fe in cpu_idle () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:256
#22 0x081afdee in rest_init () at init/main.c:453
#23 0x0804953b in start_kernel () at init/main.c:650
#24 0x0804a7e1 in start_kernel_proc (unused=0x0) at arch/um/kernel/skas/process.c:46
#25 0x08064261 in run_kernel_thread (fn=0x804a7b5 <start_kernel_proc>, arg=0x0, jmp_ptr=0x821d184) at arch/um/os-Linux/process.c:267
#26 0x08057ee0 in new_thread_handler () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:151
#27 0x00000000 in ?? ()
(gdb) frame 1
#1 0x080824b4 in ktime_get_ts (ts=0x8217d10) at kernel/hrtimer.c:122
122 getnstimeofday(ts);
(gdb) print *ts
$3 = {tv_sec = -1963377075, tv_nsec = 320917000}
It's stuck inside timespec_add_ns(), never leaving: this has been
inlined, so spying on its locals or parameters with GDB is pretty much a
no-hoper :/
Still, it's obvious enough to me that __get_nsec_offset() is returning a
negative value in getnstimeofday(), so timespec_add_ns() is looping,
well, not *forever*, but near enough, trying to push that u64 back down
to zero in units of NSEC_PER_SEC...
I hope this gives you a bit more of a clue.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next reply other threads:[~2008-04-25 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-25 19:59 Nix [this message]
2008-04-25 22:06 ` [uml-devel] actually useful backtrace from a CPU-chewing hang Nix
2008-04-26 18:31 ` Nix
2008-04-27 14:02 ` Nix
2008-04-28 16:44 ` Jeff Dike
2008-04-30 21:49 ` Nix
2008-05-01 15:13 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-01 23:34 ` Nix
2008-05-02 16:30 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-02 18:55 ` Nix
2008-05-02 19:57 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-02 23:21 ` Nix
2008-05-03 0:56 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-03 10:08 ` Nix
2008-05-09 15:16 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-09 17:13 ` vincent-perrier
2008-05-09 20:32 ` Nix
2008-05-14 17:23 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-14 18:03 ` vincent-perrier
2008-05-14 18:18 ` vincent-perrier
2008-05-14 18:29 ` vincent-perrier
2008-05-14 19:39 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-14 20:12 ` Nix
2008-05-14 20:31 ` Nix
2008-05-14 20:43 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-14 22:02 ` Nix
2008-05-19 18:54 ` [uml-devel] plug_and_play_clownix_network vincent-perrier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877iel7ljp.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix \
--to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=jdike@linux.intel.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox