From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] actually useful backtrace from a CPU-chewing hang
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:02:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wsmjbdl2.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871w4sqxgv.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> (nix@esperi.org.uk's message of "Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:31:44 +0100")
On 26 Apr 2008, nix@esperi.org.uk uttered the following:
> On 25 Apr 2008, nix@esperi.org.uk uttered the following:
>
>> On 25 Apr 2008, nix@esperi.org.uk told this:
>>
>>> I suspect this can go wrong anywhere, but it happens to have been a
>>> CBQ-triggered gettimeofday() while sending an arp that did it. (My ADSL
>>> router pretty much bombs the poor damn machine with ARP packets all the
>>> time.)
>>
>> Woo, it's happening a lot tonight.
>
> The cause of this is almost certainly time-skewing on the *host* via
> adjtimex(). I stopped ntpd and there were no problems for half a day: I
> restarted it, and as soon as ntpd had synched and begun slewing the time
> (within a second of slewing beginning, probably less than that), *wham*:
Time-stepping on the host is enough to cause trouble. I switched to
using ntpdate -b to keep time in synch, and since then my UML instances
have gone into mad loops only on the hour, when the ntpdate time-step
should take place.
--
`If you are having a "ua luea luea le ua le" kind of day, I can only
assume that you are doing no work due [to] incapacitating nausea caused
by numerous lazy demons.' --- Frossie
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-27 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-25 19:59 [uml-devel] actually useful backtrace from a CPU-chewing hang Nix
2008-04-25 22:06 ` Nix
2008-04-26 18:31 ` Nix
2008-04-27 14:02 ` Nix [this message]
2008-04-28 16:44 ` Jeff Dike
2008-04-30 21:49 ` Nix
2008-05-01 15:13 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-01 23:34 ` Nix
2008-05-02 16:30 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-02 18:55 ` Nix
2008-05-02 19:57 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-02 23:21 ` Nix
2008-05-03 0:56 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-03 10:08 ` Nix
2008-05-09 15:16 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-09 17:13 ` vincent-perrier
2008-05-09 20:32 ` Nix
2008-05-14 17:23 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-14 18:03 ` vincent-perrier
2008-05-14 18:18 ` vincent-perrier
2008-05-14 18:29 ` vincent-perrier
2008-05-14 19:39 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-14 20:12 ` Nix
2008-05-14 20:31 ` Nix
2008-05-14 20:43 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-14 22:02 ` Nix
2008-05-19 18:54 ` [uml-devel] plug_and_play_clownix_network vincent-perrier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wsmjbdl2.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix \
--to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=jdike@linux.intel.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox