From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] actually useful backtrace from a CPU-chewing hang
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:06:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ve256146.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877iel7ljp.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> (nix@esperi.org.uk's message of "Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:59:38 +0100")
On 25 Apr 2008, nix@esperi.org.uk told this:
> I suspect this can go wrong anywhere, but it happens to have been a
> CBQ-triggered gettimeofday() while sending an arp that did it. (My ADSL
> router pretty much bombs the poor damn machine with ARP packets all the
> time.)
Woo, it's happening a lot tonight.
The CBQ/ARP problem recurred, and also this:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7f87410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0x45f27b36 in gettimeofday () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x08065417 in os_nsecs () at arch/um/os-Linux/time.c:79
#3 0x080590fc in itimer_read () at arch/um/kernel/time.c:77
#4 0x08084a5f in update_wall_time () at include/linux/clocksource.h:167
#5 0x08077ba1 in do_timer (ticks=1) at kernel/timer.c:929
#6 0x08086350 in tick_periodic (cpu=0) at kernel/time/tick-common.c:66
#7 0x08086382 in tick_handle_periodic (dev=0x821d384) at kernel/time/tick-common.c:82
#8 0x080590ed in um_timer (irq=0, dev=0x0) at arch/um/kernel/time.c:70
#9 0x0808d42f in handle_IRQ_event (irq=0, action=0xdc49480) at kernel/irq/handle.c:140
#10 0x0808d4ad in __do_IRQ (irq=0) at kernel/irq/handle.c:236
#11 0x080576f8 in do_IRQ (irq=0, regs=0x8217ec4) at arch/um/kernel/irq.c:335
#12 0x080590a0 in timer_handler (sig=26, regs=0x8217ec4) at arch/um/kernel/time.c:28
#13 0x08064c84 in real_alarm_handler (sc=0x0) at arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c:93
#14 0x08064cac in alarm_handler (sig=26, sc=0x0) at arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c:108
#15 0x080654a0 in deliver_alarm () at arch/um/os-Linux/time.c:117
#16 0x08065640 in idle_sleep (nsecs=<value optimized out>) at arch/um/os-Linux/time.c:181
#17 0x080580d4 in default_idle () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:248
#18 0x080580fe in cpu_idle () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:256
#19 0x081afdee in rest_init () at init/main.c:453
#20 0x0804953b in start_kernel () at init/main.c:650
#21 0x0804a7e1 in start_kernel_proc (unused=0x0) at arch/um/kernel/skas/process.c:46
#22 0x08064261 in run_kernel_thread (fn=0x804a7b5 <start_kernel_proc>, arg=0x0, jmp_ptr=0x821d184) at arch/um/os-Linux/process.c:267
#23 0x08057ee0 in new_thread_handler () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:151
#24 0x00000000 in ?? ()
It looks to me like os_nsecs()/gettimeofday()/et al are the only really
important parts of this backtrace.
--
`If you are having a "ua luea luea le ua le" kind of day, I can only
assume that you are doing no work due [to] incapacitating nausea caused
by numerous lazy demons.' --- Frossie
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-25 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-25 19:59 [uml-devel] actually useful backtrace from a CPU-chewing hang Nix
2008-04-25 22:06 ` Nix [this message]
2008-04-26 18:31 ` Nix
2008-04-27 14:02 ` Nix
2008-04-28 16:44 ` Jeff Dike
2008-04-30 21:49 ` Nix
2008-05-01 15:13 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-01 23:34 ` Nix
2008-05-02 16:30 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-02 18:55 ` Nix
2008-05-02 19:57 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-02 23:21 ` Nix
2008-05-03 0:56 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-03 10:08 ` Nix
2008-05-09 15:16 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-09 17:13 ` vincent-perrier
2008-05-09 20:32 ` Nix
2008-05-14 17:23 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-14 18:03 ` vincent-perrier
2008-05-14 18:18 ` vincent-perrier
2008-05-14 18:29 ` vincent-perrier
2008-05-14 19:39 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-14 20:12 ` Nix
2008-05-14 20:31 ` Nix
2008-05-14 20:43 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-14 22:02 ` Nix
2008-05-19 18:54 ` [uml-devel] plug_and_play_clownix_network vincent-perrier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ve256146.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix \
--to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=jdike@linux.intel.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox