Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH] uml: support a separate build tree; support USER_OBJS dependencies

["Vadim Abrossimov" <vadim_abrossimov@yahoo.com>]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:30:54 +0100, Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>  
wrote:

> Ok, I have two more requests, if possible:
> 1) add something like arch/um/Rules.make which is included everywhere  
> needed
> 2) There is an error in the patch (even in Al's idea): you must swap, in  
> the below code

OK. I will do it.
Against which version you would suggest me to do it:
- as an add-on to 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 + Jeff's tarball (which already includes  
the original USER_OBJ cleanup)
- 2.6 bk
- any other

Also I have more general questions about the usual way the uml community  
works:
- do the patches from Jeff's tarball are intended to be pushed in 2.6 BK?  
if yes when and how?
- if one propose a patch against which version he/she should do it in  
order to (1) be useful for the community (2) get the patch pushed in 2.6  
BK soon? (Presumably (1) and (2) have the same answer :->)

Dima


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel