From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Vadim Abrossimov <vadim_abrossimov@yahoo.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH] uml: support a separate build tree; support USER_OBJS dependencies
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:50:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200502132151.j1DLoxnW003492@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:58:39 +0100." <opsl5gb1holfdzum@localhost.localdomain>
vadim_abrossimov@yahoo.com said:
> Apparently my changes to support 'O=' are quite obsolete:
Not entirely - it's nice to see the same changes from two different sources,
although the first source was Al, which greatly reduces the chances that they
are wrong...
> The second change proposed in my patch concerned USER_OBJS
> dependences: I removed specific rules using the generic Kbuild rule
> just overwriting 'c_flags':
> I agree that it's not very elegant and robust but it does the job and
> could be useful until Kbuild will provide a clean way to do it.
It is still better than what I have now.
> If you think useful, I may create a patch with this change only.
> Should I do it against 2.6.10 as an add-on to the http://
> user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/patches.html tarball?
Yup, that would be useful.
> That lead me to another question: why we don't use directly BitKeeper?
> We could have a repository for uml development.
I used BK for a while. I just found that quilt fits my development style
better.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-13 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <opsl43d9yilfdzum@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <200502131813.j1DICsnW002251@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
[not found] ` <20050213164652.GE8859@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
2005-02-13 18:58 ` [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH] uml: support a separate build tree; support USER_OBJS dependencies Vadim Abrossimov
2005-02-13 21:50 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2005-02-13 23:11 ` Vadim Abrossimov
2005-02-16 18:30 ` Blaisorblade
2005-02-19 10:55 ` Vadim Abrossimov
2005-02-24 16:31 ` Blaisorblade
2005-02-19 14:04 ` Vadim Abrossimov
2005-02-24 18:19 ` Blaisorblade
2005-02-14 1:13 ` Al Viro
2005-02-14 5:28 ` Vadim Abrossimov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200502132151.j1DLoxnW003492@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=vadim_abrossimov@yahoo.com \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).