From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-parport@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us, hkzlabnet@gmail.com,
reboots@g-cipher.net, mike@trausch.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] usb: misc: uss720: point pp->dev to usbdev->dev
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:24:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfFiwlWTbF5_zoUA@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMMLpeRpMwL3+c-uBrASuDOT4=YmxGRn5q1g8xKw2BAfdpujNQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 07:30:21PM -0600, Alex Henrie wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 1:39 AM Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:50:29PM -0600, Alex Henrie wrote:
> > > This avoids a "fix this legacy no-device port driver" warning.
> >
> > Please be more specific.
>
> Hello Johan, thanks for taking a look at these patches.
>
> The warning comes from parport_announce_port in
> drivers/parport/share.c. include/linux/parport.h says that dev is the
> "Physical device associated with IO/DMA." Commit 4edb38695d9a
> ("parisc: parport0: fix this legacy no-device port driver!",
> 2013-05-30) fixed a similar issue and says only "Fix the above kernel
> error from parport_announce_port() on 32bit GSC machines (e.g. B160L).
> The parport driver requires now a pointer to the device struct."
>
> Do I just need to include "The parport driver now requires a pointer
> to the device struct" in the commit message? If not, where can I learn
> more about what the dev field is for, to be able to write a better
> description of why it's necessary to fill it in?
Your commit messages need to be self-contained and explain *why* you
think your proposed change is needed, and in enough detail that a
reviewer can make a judgement as to whether the patch is correct or not.
Basically all my comments were just pointing this out.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-13 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-12 5:50 [PATCH 1/7] docs: driver-api: parport-lowlevel: clarify purpose of PARPORT_MODE_PCSPP Alex Henrie
2024-03-12 5:50 ` [PATCH 2/7] usb: serial: mos7720: don't advertise PARPORT_MODE_PCSPP Alex Henrie
2024-03-12 7:39 ` Johan Hovold
2024-03-12 9:53 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2024-03-12 15:27 ` Daniel Gimpelevich
2024-03-13 1:30 ` Alex Henrie
2024-03-26 9:10 ` Greg KH
2024-03-12 5:50 ` [PATCH 3/7] usb: misc: uss720: " Alex Henrie
2024-03-12 5:50 ` [PATCH 4/7] usb: misc: uss720: point pp->dev to usbdev->dev Alex Henrie
2024-03-12 7:40 ` Johan Hovold
2024-03-13 1:30 ` Alex Henrie
2024-03-13 8:24 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2024-03-26 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] usb: misc: uss720: improve support for Belkin F5U002 devices Alex Henrie
2024-03-26 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] usb: misc: uss720: point pp->dev to usbdev->dev Alex Henrie
2024-03-26 20:14 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2024-03-26 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] usb: misc: uss720: document the names of the compatible devices Alex Henrie
2024-03-26 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] usb: misc: uss720: add support for another variant of the Belkin F5U002 Alex Henrie
2024-03-26 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] usb: misc: uss720: check for incompatible versions " Alex Henrie
2024-03-12 5:50 ` [PATCH 5/7] usb: misc: uss720: document the names of the compatible devices Alex Henrie
2024-03-12 16:00 ` Daniel Gimpelevich
2024-03-12 5:50 ` [PATCH 6/7] usb: misc: uss720: add support for another variant of the Belkin F5U002 Alex Henrie
2024-03-12 15:31 ` Daniel Gimpelevich
2024-03-13 1:22 ` Alex Henrie
2024-03-12 5:50 ` [PATCH 7/7] usb: misc: uss720: check for incompatible versions " Alex Henrie
2024-03-12 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] docs: driver-api: parport-lowlevel: clarify purpose of PARPORT_MODE_PCSPP Johan Hovold
2024-03-12 15:24 ` Daniel Gimpelevich
2024-03-13 1:18 ` Alex Henrie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZfFiwlWTbF5_zoUA@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=alexhenrie24@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us \
--cc=hkzlabnet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-parport@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike@trausch.us \
--cc=reboots@g-cipher.net \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox