From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] iwlwifi: remove implicit direct scan
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:21:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1225214465.3598.27.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
When an undirected scan is requested and iwlwifi is not associated but
the user has set an SSID (and maybe was associated with that network at
some point) then iwlwifi will assume the user wanted to scan for this
SSID which seems wrong. Remove this code.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
---
Am I missing something? This seems very strange! What specifies that
when an SSID is set on an interface the user wants to scan for that one?
The interface might just have been associated previously to that SSID,
now disassociated and network manager is asking for a scan to get
information about networks to let the user select a new one.
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c | 7 -------
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c | 8 --------
2 files changed, 15 deletions(-)
--- everything.orig/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c 2008-10-28 18:12:02.000000000 +0100
+++ everything/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c 2008-10-28 18:12:06.000000000 +0100
@@ -743,13 +743,6 @@ static void iwl_bg_request_scan(struct w
memcpy(scan->direct_scan[0].ssid,
priv->direct_ssid, priv->direct_ssid_len);
n_probes++;
- } else if (!iwl_is_associated(priv) && priv->essid_len) {
- IWL_DEBUG_SCAN("Start direct scan for '%s' (not associated)\n",
- print_ssid(ssid, priv->essid, priv->essid_len));
- scan->direct_scan[0].id = WLAN_EID_SSID;
- scan->direct_scan[0].len = priv->essid_len;
- memcpy(scan->direct_scan[0].ssid, priv->essid, priv->essid_len);
- n_probes++;
} else {
IWL_DEBUG_SCAN("Start indirect scan.\n");
}
--- everything.orig/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c 2008-10-28 18:12:20.000000000 +0100
+++ everything/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c 2008-10-28 18:12:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -6158,14 +6158,6 @@ static void iwl3945_bg_request_scan(stru
memcpy(scan->direct_scan[0].ssid,
priv->direct_ssid, priv->direct_ssid_len);
n_probes++;
- } else if (!iwl3945_is_associated(priv) && priv->essid_len) {
- IWL_DEBUG_SCAN
- ("Kicking off one direct scan for '%s' when not associated\n",
- print_ssid(ssid, priv->essid, priv->essid_len));
- scan->direct_scan[0].id = WLAN_EID_SSID;
- scan->direct_scan[0].len = priv->essid_len;
- memcpy(scan->direct_scan[0].ssid, priv->essid, priv->essid_len);
- n_probes++;
} else
IWL_DEBUG_SCAN("Kicking off one indirect scan.\n");
next reply other threads:[~2008-10-28 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-28 17:21 Johannes Berg [this message]
2008-10-28 20:53 ` [PATCH] iwlwifi: remove implicit direct scan Tomas Winkler
2008-10-28 21:54 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-28 22:59 ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-28 23:48 ` Tomas Winkler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1225214465.3598.27.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox