Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "John Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: remove implicit direct scan
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:53:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ba2fa240810281353u4b038cf2gb46cb830b278a278@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225214465.3598.27.camel@johannes.berg>

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> When an undirected scan is requested and iwlwifi is not associated but
> the user has set an SSID (and maybe was associated with that network at
> some point) then iwlwifi will assume the user wanted to scan for this
> SSID which seems wrong. Remove this code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> ---
> Am I missing something? This seems very strange! What specifies that
> when an SSID is set on an interface the user wants to scan for that one?
> The interface might just have been associated previously to that SSID,
> now disassociated and network manager is asking for a scan to get
> information about networks to let the user select a new one.

NACK, this is a heuristic that helps connection to configured SSID. It
doesn't mean that other ssid won't be scanned.
This code might be revised again when multiple SSID scan will be implemented
Tomas


>  drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c     |    7 -------
>  drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c |    8 --------
>  2 files changed, 15 deletions(-)
>
> --- everything.orig/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c     2008-10-28 18:12:02.000000000 +0100
> +++ everything/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c  2008-10-28 18:12:06.000000000 +0100
> @@ -743,13 +743,6 @@ static void iwl_bg_request_scan(struct w
>                memcpy(scan->direct_scan[0].ssid,
>                       priv->direct_ssid, priv->direct_ssid_len);
>                n_probes++;
> -       } else if (!iwl_is_associated(priv) && priv->essid_len) {
> -               IWL_DEBUG_SCAN("Start direct scan for '%s' (not associated)\n",
> -                               print_ssid(ssid, priv->essid, priv->essid_len));
> -               scan->direct_scan[0].id = WLAN_EID_SSID;
> -               scan->direct_scan[0].len = priv->essid_len;
> -               memcpy(scan->direct_scan[0].ssid, priv->essid, priv->essid_len);
> -               n_probes++;
>        } else {
>                IWL_DEBUG_SCAN("Start indirect scan.\n");
>        }
> --- everything.orig/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c 2008-10-28 18:12:20.000000000 +0100
> +++ everything/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c      2008-10-28 18:12:27.000000000 +0100
> @@ -6158,14 +6158,6 @@ static void iwl3945_bg_request_scan(stru
>                memcpy(scan->direct_scan[0].ssid,
>                       priv->direct_ssid, priv->direct_ssid_len);
>                n_probes++;
> -       } else if (!iwl3945_is_associated(priv) && priv->essid_len) {
> -               IWL_DEBUG_SCAN
> -                 ("Kicking off one direct scan for '%s' when not associated\n",
> -                  print_ssid(ssid, priv->essid, priv->essid_len));
> -               scan->direct_scan[0].id = WLAN_EID_SSID;
> -               scan->direct_scan[0].len = priv->essid_len;
> -               memcpy(scan->direct_scan[0].ssid, priv->essid, priv->essid_len);
> -               n_probes++;
>        } else
>                IWL_DEBUG_SCAN("Kicking off one indirect scan.\n");
>
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-28 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-28 17:21 [PATCH] iwlwifi: remove implicit direct scan Johannes Berg
2008-10-28 20:53 ` Tomas Winkler [this message]
2008-10-28 21:54   ` Tomas Winkler
2008-10-28 22:59     ` Johannes Berg
2008-10-28 23:48       ` Tomas Winkler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ba2fa240810281353u4b038cf2gb46cb830b278a278@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tomasw@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox