From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Will Keaney <keaneyw@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT v9] rfkill: rewrite
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:59:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242151180.3203.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A09B130.9000106@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 13:26 -0400, Will Keaney wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
> > This patch completely rewrites the rfkill core to address
> > the following deficiencies:
> >
> > * all rfkill drivers need to implement polling where necessary
> > rather than having one central implementation
> >
> > * updating the rfkill state cannot be done from arbitrary
> > contexts, forcing drivers to use schedule_work and requiring
> > lots of code
> >
> > * rfkill drivers need to keep track of soft/hard blocked
> > internally -- the core should do this
> >
> > * the rfkill API has many unexpected quirks, for example being
> > asymmetric wrt. alloc/free and register/unregister
> >
> > * rfkill can call back into a driver from within a function the
> > driver called -- this is prone to deadlocks and generally
> > should be avoided
> >
> > * rfkill-input pointlessly is a separate module
> >
> Please leave rfkill-input available as a module, at least until the bug
> I reported in my previous e-mail 'Soft Lockup With rfkill_input and
> thinkpad_acpi' is resolved. Otherwise it will render Thinkpads, and
> possibly other systems, unusable with rfkill enabled.
The problem gets fixed where the problem is at... if the actual root
cause is in the rfkill rewrite, then maybe Johannes should take a look.
If the actual root cause is a bug in thinkpad-acpi, then it shouldn't
block the rfkill rewrite, but should be fixed in thinkpad-acpi.
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-12 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-11 8:31 [RFT v9] rfkill: rewrite Johannes Berg
2009-05-12 14:09 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-05-13 10:49 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-13 14:36 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-05-13 14:38 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-13 21:48 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-05-13 21:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-05-14 9:02 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-05-14 9:08 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-14 9:58 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-05-14 10:00 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-14 4:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-05-14 8:24 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-05-12 17:26 ` Will Keaney
2009-05-12 17:52 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-12 17:59 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2009-05-12 18:04 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-12 18:09 ` Will Keaney
2009-05-12 18:13 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-13 21:40 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-05-13 22:19 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-15 1:27 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-05-15 8:23 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-18 11:00 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-05-19 12:12 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-19 18:24 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1242151180.3203.19.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=keaneyw@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox