Re: [RFT v9] rfkill: rewrite

["Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>]

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Alan Jenkins
<sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 5/11/09, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
>> This patch completely rewrites the rfkill core to address
>> the following deficiencies:
>
> Btw, git-apply nitpicks on your whitespace
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0rfkill-rewrite.patch:4335: space before tab in indent.
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_=
mutex);
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
>
>
> I tested on todays wireless-testing, aka v2.6.30-rc5-23297-gbf2c6a3.
> Somehow, it triggers an OOPS
>
> Function: req_reg_info_regd
> Process: modprobe
>
> Call trace:
> wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory
> ath5k_regd_init
> ath5k_reg_notifier
> ath5k_pci_probe
> ...
>
> Photo: <http://picasaweb.google.com/sourcejedi.lkml/Screenshots#53349=
36857267342674>
>
> The kernel then hangs later on in the boot process. =C2=A0It responds=
 to
> SysRq, but does not echo normal keypresses. =C2=A0SysRq+P shows that =
the
> kernel is in the idle task. =C2=A0I left it for three minutes, but I =
didn't
> get any trace from the hung task detector or soft lockup detector.
>
> At first I thought it must be a problem with wireless-testing.
> However, it went away when I eventually tried un-applying the rfkill
> rewrite patch.

I think my new 4 patches should address this and it'd be great to hear
your tests as you can reproduce easily. We are able to see something
like this but only after 3 hours of testing. Since it seems you might
be able to reproduce quickly it would help.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles=
s" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html