From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] mac80211: tell driver when dtim change detected
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:11:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264450301.23766.65.camel@johannes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100125183543.GB19528@jm.kir.nu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1472 bytes --]
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 10:35 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:03:01PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > The other solution I see is that we add a new step before or after the
> > direct probe step, which would just be "wait for a beacon". This would
> > ensure we have both probe and beacon information always ready. It would
> > also ensure we have both probe and beacon info for our new userspace
> > reporting of that.
>
> I'm somewhat concerned about this as an unconditional change for our
> association process due to the extra latency it adds. At minimum, I
> would like to see a driver flag that can be used to indicate that such
> behavior is really required and skip the extra wait if the driver does
> not need the Beacon frame before association.
>
> For most cases, I would also assume it should be possible to update the
> PS settings after having received the first Beacon frame after
> association, but if that is not enough, allowing the driver to request
> mac80211 to wait with association sounds reasonable. I just don't want
> to see additional 50 msec or so (or much worse if the AP is configured
> with insanely long beacon interval) delay popping up with every
> association by default..
Yeah that's a good point, I wondered about that too. I'll look into this
in more detail and see if we can tell the driver about the DTIM period
only with CONF_PS and enable that only after a beacon.
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-25 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-21 21:39 [PATCH v3 1/1] mac80211: tell driver when dtim change detected wey-yi.w.guy
2010-01-22 19:03 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-22 19:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-22 19:46 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-22 23:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-22 23:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-23 0:11 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-01-23 0:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-23 0:22 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-01-23 12:46 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-25 18:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-25 18:33 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-25 19:55 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-25 20:06 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-26 8:41 ` Kalle Valo
2010-01-25 18:32 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-01-25 18:36 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-25 18:38 ` Johannes Berg
2010-01-23 8:23 ` Kalle Valo
2010-01-25 18:35 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-01-25 20:11 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2010-01-25 20:46 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1264450301.23766.65.camel@johannes.local \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox