public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] iwlwifi: move scan completed flags handling
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:50:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284133828.6054.11.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284128807-11436-4-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com>

On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 07:26 -0700, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> 
> Move the scan completed flags handling so that we
> can notify mac80211 about aborted scans with the
> correct status. Also queue the scan_completed work
> before the BT status update so that it won't see
> the bits still set (unless a new scan was started
> in which case that's fine.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Wey-Yi W Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c |   30 ++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c
> index 6bd14bc..22bdc98 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c
> @@ -222,21 +222,11 @@ static void iwl_rx_scan_complete_notif(struct iwl_priv *priv,
>  		       jiffies_to_msecs(elapsed_jiffies
>  					(priv->scan_start, jiffies)));
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * If a request to abort was given, or the scan did not succeed
> -	 * then we reset the scan state machine and terminate,
> -	 * re-queuing another scan if one has been requested
> -	 */
> -	if (test_and_clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status))
> -		IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Aborted scan completed.\n");
> -
> -	IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Setting scan to off\n");
> -
> -	clear_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status);
> +	queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->scan_completed);
>  
>  	if (priv->iw_mode != NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC &&
> -	    priv->cfg->advanced_bt_coexist && priv->bt_status !=
> -	    scan_notif->bt_status) {
> +	    priv->cfg->advanced_bt_coexist &&
> +	    priv->bt_status != scan_notif->bt_status) {
>  		if (scan_notif->bt_status) {
>  			/* BT on */
>  			if (!priv->bt_ch_announce)
> @@ -254,7 +244,6 @@ static void iwl_rx_scan_complete_notif(struct iwl_priv *priv,
>  		priv->bt_status = scan_notif->bt_status;
>  		queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->bt_traffic_change_work);
>  	}
> -	queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->scan_completed);
>  }
>  
>  void iwl_setup_rx_scan_handlers(struct iwl_priv *priv)
> @@ -554,7 +543,7 @@ static void iwl_bg_scan_completed(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct iwl_priv *priv =
>  	    container_of(work, struct iwl_priv, scan_completed);
> -	bool internal = false;
> +	bool internal = false, aborted;
>  	struct iwl_rxon_context *ctx;
>  
>  	IWL_DEBUG_SCAN(priv, "SCAN complete scan\n");
> @@ -562,6 +551,15 @@ static void iwl_bg_scan_completed(struct work_struct *work)
>  	cancel_delayed_work(&priv->scan_check);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
> +
> +	aborted = test_and_clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status);
> +	if (aborted)
> +		IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Aborted scan completed.\n");
> +
> +	IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Setting scan to off\n");
> +
> +	clear_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status);
> +
>  	if (priv->is_internal_short_scan) {
>  		priv->is_internal_short_scan = false;
>  		IWL_DEBUG_SCAN(priv, "internal short scan completed\n");
> @@ -569,7 +567,7 @@ static void iwl_bg_scan_completed(struct work_struct *work)
>  	} else if (priv->scan_request) {
>  		priv->scan_request = NULL;
>  		priv->scan_vif = NULL;
> -		ieee80211_scan_completed(priv->hw, false);
> +		ieee80211_scan_completed(priv->hw, aborted);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (test_bit(STATUS_EXIT_PENDING, &priv->status))


  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-10 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-10 14:26 [PATCH 0/14 v3] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] iwlwifi: remove unused conf variables Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:49   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 02/14] iwlwifi: unify scan start checks Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:49   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 03/14] iwlwifi: move scan completed flags handling Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:50   ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 04/14] iwlwifi: cancel scan when down the device Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:50   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 05/14] iwlwifi: report scan completion when abort fail Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:51   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 06/14] iwlwifi: rework iwl_scan_cancel_timeout Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:52   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 07/14] iwlwifi: rewrite scan completion Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:52   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] iwlwifi: force scan complete after timeout Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:53   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 09/14] iwlwifi: assure we complete scan in scan_abort and scan_check works Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:54   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 10/14] iwlwifi: do not force complete scan too early Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:54   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 11/14] mac80211: wait for scan work complete before restarting hw Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:55   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 12/14] iwlwifi: cleanup scan initiate check Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:55   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 13/14] iwlwifi: use IWL_DEBUG_SCAN for debug scanning Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:56   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 14/14] iwlwifi: apply settings when finishing scan Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:56   ` Guy, Wey-Yi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-13 12:46 [PATCH 0/14 v4] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-13 12:46 ` [PATCH 03/14] iwlwifi: move scan completed flags handling Stanislaw Gruszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1284133828.6054.11.camel@wwguy-ubuntu \
    --to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox