From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] iwlwifi: report scan completion when abort fail
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:51:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284133879.6054.13.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284128807-11436-6-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 07:26 -0700, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> When we are not able to send abort command to firmware, notify mac80211
> that we complete scan, as we will newer do it lately. Check for all
> possible errors that low level sending command procedure does not check,
> to assure we catch all failures cases.
>
> Patch fix one of the causes of wdev_cleanup_work warning reported at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593566
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Wey-Yi W Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c
> index ea33849..dbb07e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c
> @@ -54,34 +54,83 @@
> #define IWL_PASSIVE_DWELL_BASE (100)
> #define IWL_CHANNEL_TUNE_TIME 5
>
> +static int iwl_send_scan_abort(struct iwl_priv *priv)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct iwl_rx_packet *pkt;
> + struct iwl_host_cmd cmd = {
> + .id = REPLY_SCAN_ABORT_CMD,
> + .flags = CMD_WANT_SKB,
> + };
>
> + /* Exit instantly with error when device is not ready
> + * to receive scan abort command or it does not perform
> + * hardware scan currently */
> + if (!test_bit(STATUS_READY, &priv->status) ||
> + !test_bit(STATUS_GEO_CONFIGURED, &priv->status) ||
> + !test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status) ||
> + test_bit(STATUS_FW_ERROR, &priv->status) ||
> + test_bit(STATUS_EXIT_PENDING, &priv->status))
> + return -EIO;
>
> -/**
> - * iwl_scan_cancel - Cancel any currently executing HW scan
> - *
> - * NOTE: priv->mutex is not required before calling this function
> - */
> -int iwl_scan_cancel(struct iwl_priv *priv)
> -{
> - if (!test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status)) {
> - clear_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status);
> - return 0;
> + ret = iwl_send_cmd_sync(priv, &cmd);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + pkt = (struct iwl_rx_packet *)cmd.reply_page;
> + if (pkt->u.status != CAN_ABORT_STATUS) {
> + /* The scan abort will return 1 for success or
> + * 2 for "failure". A failure condition can be
> + * due to simply not being in an active scan which
> + * can occur if we send the scan abort before we
> + * the microcode has notified us that a scan is
> + * completed. */
> + IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "SCAN_ABORT ret %d.\n", pkt->u.status);
> + ret = -EIO;
> }
>
> - if (test_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status)) {
> - if (!test_and_set_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status)) {
> - IWL_DEBUG_SCAN(priv, "Queuing scan abort.\n");
> - schedule_work(&priv->abort_scan);
> + iwl_free_pages(priv, cmd.reply_page);
> + return ret;
> +}
>
> - } else
> - IWL_DEBUG_SCAN(priv, "Scan abort already in progress.\n");
> +static void iwl_do_scan_abort(struct iwl_priv *priv)
> +{
> + int ret;
>
> - return test_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&priv->mutex);
> +
> + if (!test_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status)) {
> + IWL_DEBUG_SCAN(priv, "Not performing scan to abort\n");
> + return;
> }
>
> + if (test_and_set_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status)) {
> + IWL_DEBUG_SCAN(priv, "Scan abort in progress\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ret = iwl_send_scan_abort(priv);
> + if (ret) {
> + IWL_DEBUG_SCAN(priv, "Send scan abort failed %d\n", ret);
> + clear_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status);
> + clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status);
> + clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status);
> + ieee80211_scan_completed(priv->hw, true);
> + } else
> + IWL_DEBUG_SCAN(priv, "Sucessfully send scan abort\n");
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * iwl_scan_cancel - Cancel any currently executing HW scan
> + */
> +int iwl_scan_cancel(struct iwl_priv *priv)
> +{
> + IWL_DEBUG_SCAN(priv, "Queuing abort scan\n");
> + schedule_work(&priv->abort_scan);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_scan_cancel);
> +
> /**
> * iwl_scan_cancel_timeout - Cancel any currently executing HW scan
> * @ms: amount of time to wait (in milliseconds) for scan to abort
> @@ -108,47 +157,6 @@ int iwl_scan_cancel_timeout(struct iwl_priv *priv, unsigned long ms)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_scan_cancel_timeout);
>
> -static int iwl_send_scan_abort(struct iwl_priv *priv)
> -{
> - int ret = 0;
> - struct iwl_rx_packet *pkt;
> - struct iwl_host_cmd cmd = {
> - .id = REPLY_SCAN_ABORT_CMD,
> - .flags = CMD_WANT_SKB,
> - };
> -
> - /* If there isn't a scan actively going on in the hardware
> - * then we are in between scan bands and not actually
> - * actively scanning, so don't send the abort command */
> - if (!test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status)) {
> - clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - ret = iwl_send_cmd_sync(priv, &cmd);
> - if (ret) {
> - clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status);
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - pkt = (struct iwl_rx_packet *)cmd.reply_page;
> - if (pkt->u.status != CAN_ABORT_STATUS) {
> - /* The scan abort will return 1 for success or
> - * 2 for "failure". A failure condition can be
> - * due to simply not being in an active scan which
> - * can occur if we send the scan abort before we
> - * the microcode has notified us that a scan is
> - * completed. */
> - IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "SCAN_ABORT returned %d.\n", pkt->u.status);
> - clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status);
> - clear_bit(STATUS_SCAN_HW, &priv->status);
> - }
> -
> - iwl_free_pages(priv, cmd.reply_page);
> -
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> /* Service response to REPLY_SCAN_CMD (0x80) */
> static void iwl_rx_reply_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv,
> struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer *rxb)
> @@ -527,15 +535,10 @@ static void iwl_bg_abort_scan(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct iwl_priv *priv = container_of(work, struct iwl_priv, abort_scan);
>
> - if (!test_bit(STATUS_READY, &priv->status) ||
> - !test_bit(STATUS_GEO_CONFIGURED, &priv->status))
> - return;
> -
> cancel_delayed_work(&priv->scan_check);
>
> mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
> - if (test_bit(STATUS_SCAN_ABORTING, &priv->status))
> - iwl_send_scan_abort(priv);
> + iwl_do_scan_abort(priv);
> mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-10 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-10 14:26 [PATCH 0/14 v3] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] iwlwifi: remove unused conf variables Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:49 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 02/14] iwlwifi: unify scan start checks Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:49 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 03/14] iwlwifi: move scan completed flags handling Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:50 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 04/14] iwlwifi: cancel scan when down the device Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:50 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 05/14] iwlwifi: report scan completion when abort fail Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:51 ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 06/14] iwlwifi: rework iwl_scan_cancel_timeout Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:52 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 07/14] iwlwifi: rewrite scan completion Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:52 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] iwlwifi: force scan complete after timeout Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:53 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 09/14] iwlwifi: assure we complete scan in scan_abort and scan_check works Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:54 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 10/14] iwlwifi: do not force complete scan too early Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:54 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 11/14] mac80211: wait for scan work complete before restarting hw Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:55 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 12/14] iwlwifi: cleanup scan initiate check Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:55 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 13/14] iwlwifi: use IWL_DEBUG_SCAN for debug scanning Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:56 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-09-10 14:26 ` [PATCH 14/14] iwlwifi: apply settings when finishing scan Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-10 15:56 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-13 12:46 [PATCH 0/14 v4] iwlwifi: rewrite iwl-scan.c to avoid race conditions Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-09-13 12:46 ` [PATCH 05/14] iwlwifi: report scan completion when abort fail Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1284133879.6054.13.camel@wwguy-ubuntu \
--to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox