public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] mac80211: Disable off-channel powersave when software scans are suspended
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 07:27:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130109132753.GB18778@thinkpad-t410> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130109110343.GA13544@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 12:03:44PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:10:45PM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > Leaving powersave enabled while the scan is suspended requires the use
> > of PS-Poll to retrieve frames buffered at the AP. PS-Poll isn't a very
> > efficient means of data transfer and may not even work with drivers not
> > supporting powersave. These problems can largely be avoided by simply
> > disabling off-channel powersave when the scan is suspended and enabling
> > it again when returning to off-channel operation.
> > 
> > The results of this change are fantastic. Previously when using iperf I
> > would see greatly decreased throughput (often dropping to 0 bits/sec for
> > several seconds) and very high packet loss during software scans. This
> > patch completely eliminates the packet loss and reduces the loss in
> > throughput to very reasonable levels.
> 
> I posted a patch, which remove offchannel_ps_disable argument from
> ieee80211_offchannel_return, since there were possible AP and STA power
> save state mismash:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=135601089321822&w=2
> 
> It should give the same effect on performance as this patch.

I guess I missed that one in my pile of post-holiday emails. I agree, it
ought to have the same effect as this patch.

Seth

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-09 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-08 18:10 [RFC] Fixes for problems with off-channel powersave Seth Forshee
2013-01-08 18:10 ` [RFC 1/3] mac80211: Add flushes to ensure off-channel PS is enabled during sw scans Seth Forshee
2013-01-16 23:34   ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-17  5:34     ` Seth Forshee
2013-01-08 18:10 ` [RFC 2/3] mac80211: Convey information about off-channel powersave to drivers Seth Forshee
2013-01-08 18:10 ` [RFC 3/3] mac80211: Disable off-channel powersave when software scans are suspended Seth Forshee
2013-01-09 11:03   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-01-09 13:27     ` Seth Forshee [this message]
2013-01-09 13:40 ` [RFC] Fixes for problems with off-channel powersave Seth Forshee
2013-01-16 23:32   ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-17  5:34     ` Seth Forshee
2013-01-25 21:36       ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-25 22:11         ` Adrian Chadd
2013-01-16 23:31 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-17  5:32   ` Seth Forshee
2013-01-17  0:29 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-17  5:35   ` Seth Forshee
2013-01-25 21:34     ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-25 22:16       ` Seth Forshee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130109132753.GB18778@thinkpad-t410 \
    --to=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox