From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] mac80211: Add flushes to ensure off-channel PS is enabled during sw scans
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:34:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130117053434.GC31449@thinkpad-t410> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358379254.15012.70.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:34:14AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 12:10 -0600, Seth Forshee wrote:
>
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/offchannel.c
> > @@ -136,8 +136,23 @@ void ieee80211_offchannel_stop_vifs(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> > netif_tx_stop_all_queues(sdata->dev);
> > if (offchannel_ps_enable &&
> > (sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) &&
> > - sdata->u.mgd.associated)
> > + sdata->u.mgd.associated) {
> > + /*
> > + * Need to flush frames in driver queues
> > + * before sending nullfunc. Otherwise
> > + * devices which support QoS may send the
> > + * nullfunc before these queued frames, and
> > + * those frames may not have PM set.
> > + *
> > + * XXX: Would be nice to not flush for each
> > + * vif, however I don't see that there's any
> > + * protection to prevent frames being handed
> > + * to the driver before stopping the netdev
> > + * queue.
> > + */
> > + drv_flush(local, false);
> > ieee80211_offchannel_ps_enable(sdata);
>
> Could we split the loop, and send the frames in a second loop, to
> combine the flushes into a single one?
I started thinking about just that earlier today. Seems like it ought to
be possible.
Seth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-08 18:10 [RFC] Fixes for problems with off-channel powersave Seth Forshee
2013-01-08 18:10 ` [RFC 1/3] mac80211: Add flushes to ensure off-channel PS is enabled during sw scans Seth Forshee
2013-01-16 23:34 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-17 5:34 ` Seth Forshee [this message]
2013-01-08 18:10 ` [RFC 2/3] mac80211: Convey information about off-channel powersave to drivers Seth Forshee
2013-01-08 18:10 ` [RFC 3/3] mac80211: Disable off-channel powersave when software scans are suspended Seth Forshee
2013-01-09 11:03 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-01-09 13:27 ` Seth Forshee
2013-01-09 13:40 ` [RFC] Fixes for problems with off-channel powersave Seth Forshee
2013-01-16 23:32 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-17 5:34 ` Seth Forshee
2013-01-25 21:36 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-25 22:11 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-01-16 23:31 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-17 5:32 ` Seth Forshee
2013-01-17 0:29 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-17 5:35 ` Seth Forshee
2013-01-25 21:34 ` Johannes Berg
2013-01-25 22:16 ` Seth Forshee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130117053434.GC31449@thinkpad-t410 \
--to=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox