Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [wireless-drivers-next:master 41/48] drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac.c:653:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__rtw_download_firmware' was not declared. Should it be static?
       [not found] <202004241610.NSbGjIMy%lkp@intel.com>
@ 2020-04-24  9:45 ` Kalle Valo
  2020-04-25  2:56   ` [RFC PATCH wireless-drivers-next] rtw88: __rtw_download_firmware() can be static kbuild test robot
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2020-04-24  9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild test robot
  Cc: Ping-Ke Shih, kbuild-all, Yan-Hsuan Chuang, linux-wireless

+ linux-wireless

kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> writes:

> tree:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next.git
> master
> head:   75e69fb11b40ba1256b14f943c7050682c1f5458
> commit: 15d2fcc6b2dea46986e55cd3808c0dbb480a6c8d [41/48] rtw88: add
> legacy firmware download for 8723D devices
> reproduce:
>         # apt-get install sparse
>         # sparse version: v0.6.1-191-gc51a0382-dirty
>         git checkout 15d2fcc6b2dea46986e55cd3808c0dbb480a6c8d
>         make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
>         make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
>
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>
>>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac.c:653:5: sparse: sparse:
>>> symbol '__rtw_download_firmware' was not declared. Should it be
>>> static?
>>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac.c:817:5: sparse: sparse:
>>> symbol '__rtw_download_firmware_legacy' was not declared. Should it
>>> be static?
>
> Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

Tony, please send the patch via linux-wireless so that patchwork sees
it.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [RFC PATCH wireless-drivers-next] rtw88: __rtw_download_firmware() can be static
  2020-04-24  9:45 ` [wireless-drivers-next:master 41/48] drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac.c:653:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__rtw_download_firmware' was not declared. Should it be static? Kalle Valo
@ 2020-04-25  2:56   ` kbuild test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2020-04-25  2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ping-Ke Shih, kbuild-all, Kalle Valo, Yan-Hsuan Chuang,
	linux-wireless, linux-kernel


Fixes: 15d2fcc6b2de ("rtw88: add legacy firmware download for 8723D devices")
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
 mac.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac.c
index 6092604abfb9e..3cc0b363df8ce 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac.c
@@ -650,7 +650,7 @@ static void download_firmware_end_flow(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
 	rtw_write16(rtwdev, REG_MCUFW_CTRL, fw_ctrl);
 }
 
-int __rtw_download_firmware(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_fw_state *fw)
+static int __rtw_download_firmware(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_fw_state *fw)
 {
 	struct rtw_backup_info bckp[DLFW_RESTORE_REG_NUM];
 	const u8 *data = fw->firmware->data;
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static int download_firmware_validate_legacy(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-int __rtw_download_firmware_legacy(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_fw_state *fw)
+static int __rtw_download_firmware_legacy(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_fw_state *fw)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-25  2:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <202004241610.NSbGjIMy%lkp@intel.com>
2020-04-24  9:45 ` [wireless-drivers-next:master 41/48] drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac.c:653:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__rtw_download_firmware' was not declared. Should it be static? Kalle Valo
2020-04-25  2:56   ` [RFC PATCH wireless-drivers-next] rtw88: __rtw_download_firmware() can be static kbuild test robot

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox