From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ku920601@realtek.com>, <damon.chen@realtek.com>,
<phhuang@realtek.com>, <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Subject: [PATCH rtw-next 11/11] wifi: rtw89: phy: fix antenna gain unit in debug output
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 14:06:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261112060600.71784-12-pkshih@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112060600.71784-1-pkshih@realtek.com>
From: Kuan-Chung Chen <damon.chen@realtek.com>
The antenna gain offset is in RF TX power precision, so shift
right by txpwr_factor_rf before printing it.
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Chung Chen <damon.chen@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
index 795920b899d9..bbbe43e1ea04 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
@@ -2391,6 +2391,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtw89_phy_ant_gain_pwr_offset);
int rtw89_print_ant_gain(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz,
const struct rtw89_chan *chan)
{
+ u8 factor = rtwdev->chip->txpwr_factor_rf;
char *p = buf, *end = buf + bufsz;
s8 offset_patha, offset_pathb;
@@ -2402,8 +2403,8 @@ int rtw89_print_ant_gain(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz,
offset_patha = rtw89_phy_ant_gain_query(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, chan->freq);
offset_pathb = rtw89_phy_ant_gain_query(rtwdev, RF_PATH_B, chan->freq);
- p += scnprintf(p, end - p, "ChainA offset: %d dBm\n", offset_patha);
- p += scnprintf(p, end - p, "ChainB offset: %d dBm\n", offset_pathb);
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p, "ChainA offset: %d dBm\n", offset_patha >> factor);
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p, "ChainB offset: %d dBm\n", offset_pathb >> factor);
out:
return p - buf;
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 6:05 [PATCH rtw-next 00/11] wifi: rtw89: correct no 2GHz band condition, update RTL8922D settings Ping-Ke Shih
2026-11-12 6:05 ` [PATCH rtw-next 01/11] wifi: rtw89: coex: add a notify entry for dynamic MLO RF-path switch Ping-Ke Shih
2026-11-12 6:05 ` [PATCH rtw-next 02/11] wifi: rtw89: pci: reclaim TXBD before fully draining Ping-Ke Shih
2026-11-12 6:05 ` [PATCH rtw-next 03/11] wifi: rtw89: 8922d: use efuse bias for CCK RX gain Ping-Ke Shih
2026-11-12 6:05 ` [PATCH rtw-next 04/11] wifi: rtw89: 8922d: set CFR clip threshold while setting channel Ping-Ke Shih
2026-11-12 6:05 ` [PATCH rtw-next 05/11] wifi: rtw89: 8922d: correct thermal trim range to -16~+16 programmed in efuse Ping-Ke Shih
2026-11-12 6:05 ` [PATCH rtw-next 06/11] wifi: rtw89: introduce bitmap of supported bands to deal with quirks Ping-Ke Shih
2026-11-12 6:05 ` [PATCH rtw-next 07/11] wifi: rtw89: get default channel based on supported bands Ping-Ke Shih
2026-11-12 6:05 ` [PATCH rtw-next 08/11] wifi: rtw89: fix band assignment in rtw89_core_update_rx_freq_from_ie() Ping-Ke Shih
2026-11-12 6:05 ` [PATCH rtw-next 09/11] wifi: rtw89: Update sequence for MLO link switch Ping-Ke Shih
2026-11-12 6:05 ` [PATCH rtw-next 10/11] wifi: rtw89: 8922d: enable dynamic antenna gain Ping-Ke Shih
2026-11-12 6:06 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261112060600.71784-12-pkshih@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=damon.chen@realtek.com \
--cc=kevin_yang@realtek.com \
--cc=ku920601@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phhuang@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox