ath10k regression on XPS13

ath10k regression on XPS13

[Kalle Valo]

(Changing subject, adding Dave and relevant lists)

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/hid.git for-linus
>>
>> to receive HID subsystem updates for 4.11:
>
> The touchpad on my XPS13 no longer works. It might not be this pull
> request, and I'll bisect the exact cause, but this pull seems the most
> likely culprit.
>
> Just an early heads-up,

While talking about XPS13 also a heads-up from me as we have a nasty
regression in ath10k on XPS13 with QCA6174 (though not sure if you have
QCA6174, recent models seem to have that) which completely breaks driver
initialisation an error:

"ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: failed to fetch board data for
bus=pci,vendor=168c,device=003e,subsystem-vendor=1a56,subsystem-device=1535,variant=RV_0520
from ath10k/QCA6174/hw3.0/board-2.bin"

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185621#c9

This is caused by this commit which I believe Dave will be sending to
you soon:

f2593cb1b291 ath10k: Search SMBIOS for OEM board file extension

As a workaround I recommend updating ath10k/QCA6174/hw3.0/board-2.bin
from this link _before_ updating the kernel:

https://github.com/kvalo/ath10k-firmware/blob/8d15818b0f9c7b09f743538ac2d3e1409779f52a/QCA6174/hw3.0/board-2.bin

We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older
board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Re: ath10k regression on XPS13

[David Miller]

From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:49 +0200

> We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older
> board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still.

Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later
today.  But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first.

Please get this to me as soon as possible, thanks.

Re: ath10k regression on XPS13

[Kalle Valo]

David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:

> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:49 +0200
>
>> We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older
>> board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still.
>
> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later
> today.  But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first.
>
> Please get this to me as soon as possible, thanks.

We have a fix now but it's not really tested that well so I'm reluctant
to submit it yet. As I don't want to make you wait I think I'll submit
you a patch reverting f2593cb1b291 in an hour or two. And later in the
week I send you a properly fixed (and tested) version of f2593cb1b291.

Does that sound ok to you?

-- 
Kalle Valo

Re: ath10k regression on XPS13

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:18 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later
> today.  But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first.

Feel free to send it to me - it sounds like the regression is
 (a) easy to work around
and
 (b) has a fix coming up.

And it won't even be something that I personally notice, since I have
the prev-gen XPS13 that has intel wireless.

              Linus

Re: ath10k regression on XPS13

[David Miller]

From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:38:48 +0200

> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> 
>> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:49 +0200
>>
>>> We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older
>>> board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still.
>>
>> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later
>> today.  But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first.
>>
>> Please get this to me as soon as possible, thanks.
> 
> We have a fix now but it's not really tested that well so I'm reluctant
> to submit it yet. As I don't want to make you wait I think I'll submit
> you a patch reverting f2593cb1b291 in an hour or two. And later in the
> week I send you a properly fixed (and tested) version of f2593cb1b291.
> 
> Does that sound ok to you?

Sure.

Re: ath10k regression on XPS13

[Kalle Valo]

David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:

> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:38:48 +0200
>
>> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
>> 
>>> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
>>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:49 +0200
>>>
>>>> We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older
>>>> board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still.
>>>
>>> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later
>>> today.  But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first.
>>>
>>> Please get this to me as soon as possible, thanks.
>> 
>> We have a fix now but it's not really tested that well so I'm reluctant
>> to submit it yet. As I don't want to make you wait I think I'll submit
>> you a patch reverting f2593cb1b291 in an hour or two. And later in the
>> week I send you a properly fixed (and tested) version of f2593cb1b291.
>> 
>> Does that sound ok to you?
>
> Sure.

Here's the revert:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/730735/

I didn't send a pull request because that felt overkill to do just for
one patch.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Re: ath10k regression on XPS13

[David Miller]

From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:49:09 +0200

> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> 
>> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:38:48 +0200
>>
>>> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
>>> 
>>>> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
>>>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:49 +0200
>>>>
>>>>> We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older
>>>>> board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still.
>>>>
>>>> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later
>>>> today.  But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first.
>>>>
>>>> Please get this to me as soon as possible, thanks.
>>> 
>>> We have a fix now but it's not really tested that well so I'm reluctant
>>> to submit it yet. As I don't want to make you wait I think I'll submit
>>> you a patch reverting f2593cb1b291 in an hour or two. And later in the
>>> week I send you a properly fixed (and tested) version of f2593cb1b291.
>>> 
>>> Does that sound ok to you?
>>
>> Sure.
> 
> Here's the revert:
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/730735/
> 
> I didn't send a pull request because that felt overkill to do just for
> one patch.

Yep, that's fine.

Re: ath10k regression on XPS13

[David Miller]

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:52:33 -0800

> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:18 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>
>> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later
>> today.  But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first.
> 
> Feel free to send it to me - it sounds like the regression is
>  (a) easy to work around
> and
>  (b) has a fix coming up.
> 
> And it won't even be something that I personally notice, since I have
> the prev-gen XPS13 that has intel wireless.

I have the revert in my tree, it's all good.

I'll let my tree sit quietly for a few hours then send a pull
request out later tonight.