* [PATCH] mac80211: fix RCU locking in __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet
@ 2008-01-16 20:47 Johannes Berg
2008-01-17 15:32 ` Ron Rindjunsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2008-01-16 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Linville; +Cc: Ron Rindjunsky, linux-wireless
Commit c7a51bda ("mac80211: restructure __ieee80211_rx") extracted
__ieee80211_rx_handle_packet out of __ieee80211_rx and hence changed
the locking rules for __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet(), it is now
invoked under RCU lock. There is, however, one instance left where
it contains an rcu_read_unlock() in an error path, which is a bug.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
---
sparse actually detected this.... oh well
net/mac80211/rx.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- everything.orig/net/mac80211/rx.c 2008-01-16 21:15:17.532295846 +0100
+++ everything/net/mac80211/rx.c 2008-01-16 21:15:44.002272517 +0100
@@ -1730,7 +1730,6 @@ void __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet(struct
ieee80211_invoke_rx_handlers(local, local->rx_handlers, &rx,
rx.sta);
sta_info_put(sta);
- rcu_read_unlock();
return;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix RCU locking in __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet 2008-01-16 20:47 [PATCH] mac80211: fix RCU locking in __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet Johannes Berg @ 2008-01-17 15:32 ` Ron Rindjunsky 2008-01-17 15:36 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Ron Rindjunsky @ 2008-01-17 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg; +Cc: John Linville, linux-wireless > > sparse actually detected this.... oh well > Arrrr... i did the re-structuring of Rx flow and forgot to sparse. I'll issue a patch to clean up the warnings. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix RCU locking in __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet 2008-01-17 15:32 ` Ron Rindjunsky @ 2008-01-17 15:36 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2008-01-17 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ron Rindjunsky; +Cc: John Linville, linux-wireless [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 655 bytes --] On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 17:32 +0200, Ron Rindjunsky wrote: > > > > sparse actually detected this.... oh well > > > > Arrrr... i did the re-structuring of Rx flow and forgot to sparse. > I'll issue a patch to clean up the warnings. No worries, the rest is just harmless missing "static" keywords. I wonder though, should we get rid of that special case completely? Jiri intended this as an 'optimisation' but since we rarely even hit the case (I had to play with monitor interfaces *and* AP mode to hit it!!) it probably hurts performance more by the extra branches and all that. And it makes it harder to verify correctness... johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-17 15:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-01-16 20:47 [PATCH] mac80211: fix RCU locking in __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet Johannes Berg 2008-01-17 15:32 ` Ron Rindjunsky 2008-01-17 15:36 ` Johannes Berg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox