From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fix s_maxbytes computation on 32-bit kernels
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 08:37:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191222163711.GT7489@magnolia> (raw)
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
I observed a hang in generic/308 while running fstests on a i686 kernel.
The hang occurred when trying to purge the pagecache on a large sparse
file that had a page created past MAX_LFS_FILESIZE, which caused an
integer overflow in the pagecache xarray and resulted in an infinite
loop.
I then noticed that Linus changed the definition of MAX_LFS_FILESIZE in
commit 0cc3b0ec23ce ("Clarify (and fix) MAX_LFS_FILESIZE macros") so
that it is now one page short of the maximum page index on 32-bit
kernels. Because the XFS function to compute max offset open-codes the
2005-era MAX_LFS_FILESIZE computation and neither the vfs nor mm perform
any sanity checking of s_maxbytes, the code in generic/308 can create a
page above the pagecache's limit and kaboom.
So, fix the function to return MAX_LFS_FILESIZE, but check that bmbt
record offsets have enough space to handle that many bytes. I have no
answer for why this seems to have been broken for years and nobody
noticed.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index d9ae27ddf253..30a17e5ffa67 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -193,30 +193,25 @@ xfs_fs_show_options(
return 0;
}
-static uint64_t
+static loff_t
xfs_max_file_offset(
- unsigned int blockshift)
+ struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- unsigned int pagefactor = 1;
- unsigned int bitshift = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
-
- /* Figure out maximum filesize, on Linux this can depend on
- * the filesystem blocksize (on 32 bit platforms).
- * __block_write_begin does this in an [unsigned] long long...
- * page->index << (PAGE_SHIFT - bbits)
- * So, for page sized blocks (4K on 32 bit platforms),
- * this wraps at around 8Tb (hence MAX_LFS_FILESIZE which is
- * (((u64)PAGE_SIZE << (BITS_PER_LONG-1))-1)
- * but for smaller blocksizes it is less (bbits = log2 bsize).
+ /*
+ * XFS block mappings use 54 bits to store the logical block offset.
+ * This should suffice to handle the maximum file size that the VFS
+ * supports (currently 2^63 bytes on 64-bit and ULONG_MAX << PAGE_SHIFT
+ * bytes on 32-bit), but as XFS and VFS have gotten the s_maxbytes
+ * calculation wrong on 32-bit kernels in the past, we'll add a WARN_ON
+ * to check this assertion before returning MAX_LFS_FILESIZE.
+ *
+ * Avoid integer overflow by comparing the maximum bmbt offset to the
+ * maximum pagecache offset in units of fs blocks.
*/
+ WARN_ON(((1ULL << BMBT_STARTOFF_BITLEN) - 1) <
+ XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, MAX_LFS_FILESIZE));
-#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
- ASSERT(sizeof(sector_t) == 8);
- pagefactor = PAGE_SIZE;
- bitshift = BITS_PER_LONG;
-#endif
-
- return (((uint64_t)pagefactor) << bitshift) - 1;
+ return MAX_LFS_FILESIZE;
}
/*
@@ -1435,7 +1430,7 @@ xfs_fc_fill_super(
sb->s_magic = XFS_SUPER_MAGIC;
sb->s_blocksize = mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
sb->s_blocksize_bits = ffs(sb->s_blocksize) - 1;
- sb->s_maxbytes = xfs_max_file_offset(sb->s_blocksize_bits);
+ sb->s_maxbytes = xfs_max_file_offset(mp);
sb->s_max_links = XFS_MAXLINK;
sb->s_time_gran = 1;
sb->s_time_min = S32_MIN;
next reply other threads:[~2019-12-22 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-22 16:37 Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-12-24 8:25 ` [PATCH] xfs: fix s_maxbytes computation on 32-bit kernels Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-24 16:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191222163711.GT7489@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox