From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix s_maxbytes computation on 32-bit kernels
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 08:37:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191224163749.GY7489@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191224082500.GB26649@infradead.org>
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 12:25:00AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 08:37:11AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > I observed a hang in generic/308 while running fstests on a i686 kernel.
> > The hang occurred when trying to purge the pagecache on a large sparse
> > file that had a page created past MAX_LFS_FILESIZE, which caused an
> > integer overflow in the pagecache xarray and resulted in an infinite
> > loop.
> >
> > I then noticed that Linus changed the definition of MAX_LFS_FILESIZE in
> > commit 0cc3b0ec23ce ("Clarify (and fix) MAX_LFS_FILESIZE macros") so
> > that it is now one page short of the maximum page index on 32-bit
> > kernels. Because the XFS function to compute max offset open-codes the
> > 2005-era MAX_LFS_FILESIZE computation and neither the vfs nor mm perform
> > any sanity checking of s_maxbytes, the code in generic/308 can create a
> > page above the pagecache's limit and kaboom.
> >
> > So, fix the function to return MAX_LFS_FILESIZE, but check that bmbt
> > record offsets have enough space to handle that many bytes. I have no
> > answer for why this seems to have been broken for years and nobody
> > noticed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> > index d9ae27ddf253..30a17e5ffa67 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> > @@ -193,30 +193,25 @@ xfs_fs_show_options(
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static uint64_t
> > +static loff_t
> > xfs_max_file_offset(
> > - unsigned int blockshift)
> > + struct xfs_mount *mp)
> > {
> > - unsigned int pagefactor = 1;
> > - unsigned int bitshift = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
> > -
> > - /* Figure out maximum filesize, on Linux this can depend on
> > - * the filesystem blocksize (on 32 bit platforms).
> > - * __block_write_begin does this in an [unsigned] long long...
> > - * page->index << (PAGE_SHIFT - bbits)
> > - * So, for page sized blocks (4K on 32 bit platforms),
> > - * this wraps at around 8Tb (hence MAX_LFS_FILESIZE which is
> > - * (((u64)PAGE_SIZE << (BITS_PER_LONG-1))-1)
> > - * but for smaller blocksizes it is less (bbits = log2 bsize).
> > + /*
> > + * XFS block mappings use 54 bits to store the logical block offset.
> > + * This should suffice to handle the maximum file size that the VFS
> > + * supports (currently 2^63 bytes on 64-bit and ULONG_MAX << PAGE_SHIFT
> > + * bytes on 32-bit), but as XFS and VFS have gotten the s_maxbytes
> > + * calculation wrong on 32-bit kernels in the past, we'll add a WARN_ON
> > + * to check this assertion before returning MAX_LFS_FILESIZE.
> > + *
> > + * Avoid integer overflow by comparing the maximum bmbt offset to the
> > + * maximum pagecache offset in units of fs blocks.
> > */
> > + WARN_ON(((1ULL << BMBT_STARTOFF_BITLEN) - 1) <
> > + XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, MAX_LFS_FILESIZE));
> >
> > -#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
> > - ASSERT(sizeof(sector_t) == 8);
> > - pagefactor = PAGE_SIZE;
> > - bitshift = BITS_PER_LONG;
> > -#endif
> > -
> > - return (((uint64_t)pagefactor) << bitshift) - 1;
> > + return MAX_LFS_FILESIZE;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -1435,7 +1430,7 @@ xfs_fc_fill_super(
> > sb->s_magic = XFS_SUPER_MAGIC;
> > sb->s_blocksize = mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
> > sb->s_blocksize_bits = ffs(sb->s_blocksize) - 1;
> > - sb->s_maxbytes = xfs_max_file_offset(sb->s_blocksize_bits);
> > + sb->s_maxbytes = xfs_max_file_offset(mp);
>
> The code organization is really weird now. Just assign MAX_LFS_FILESIZE
> to s_maxbytes directly here, and move the WARN_ON right next to it -
> preferably as a WARN_ON_ONCE with an actual error return instead of
> just warning.
Ok.
--D
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-24 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-22 16:37 [PATCH] xfs: fix s_maxbytes computation on 32-bit kernels Darrick J. Wong
2019-12-24 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-24 16:37 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191224163749.GY7489@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox