public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix s_maxbytes computation on 32-bit kernels
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:25:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191224082500.GB26649@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191222163711.GT7489@magnolia>

On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 08:37:11AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> 
> I observed a hang in generic/308 while running fstests on a i686 kernel.
> The hang occurred when trying to purge the pagecache on a large sparse
> file that had a page created past MAX_LFS_FILESIZE, which caused an
> integer overflow in the pagecache xarray and resulted in an infinite
> loop.
> 
> I then noticed that Linus changed the definition of MAX_LFS_FILESIZE in
> commit 0cc3b0ec23ce ("Clarify (and fix) MAX_LFS_FILESIZE macros") so
> that it is now one page short of the maximum page index on 32-bit
> kernels.  Because the XFS function to compute max offset open-codes the
> 2005-era MAX_LFS_FILESIZE computation and neither the vfs nor mm perform
> any sanity checking of s_maxbytes, the code in generic/308 can create a
> page above the pagecache's limit and kaboom.
> 
> So, fix the function to return MAX_LFS_FILESIZE, but check that bmbt
> record offsets have enough space to handle that many bytes.  I have no
> answer for why this seems to have been broken for years and nobody
> noticed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c |   37 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index d9ae27ddf253..30a17e5ffa67 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -193,30 +193,25 @@ xfs_fs_show_options(
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static uint64_t
> +static loff_t
>  xfs_max_file_offset(
> -	unsigned int		blockshift)
> +	struct xfs_mount	*mp)
>  {
> -	unsigned int		pagefactor = 1;
> -	unsigned int		bitshift = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
> -
> -	/* Figure out maximum filesize, on Linux this can depend on
> -	 * the filesystem blocksize (on 32 bit platforms).
> -	 * __block_write_begin does this in an [unsigned] long long...
> -	 *      page->index << (PAGE_SHIFT - bbits)
> -	 * So, for page sized blocks (4K on 32 bit platforms),
> -	 * this wraps at around 8Tb (hence MAX_LFS_FILESIZE which is
> -	 *      (((u64)PAGE_SIZE << (BITS_PER_LONG-1))-1)
> -	 * but for smaller blocksizes it is less (bbits = log2 bsize).
> +	/*
> +	 * XFS block mappings use 54 bits to store the logical block offset.
> +	 * This should suffice to handle the maximum file size that the VFS
> +	 * supports (currently 2^63 bytes on 64-bit and ULONG_MAX << PAGE_SHIFT
> +	 * bytes on 32-bit), but as XFS and VFS have gotten the s_maxbytes
> +	 * calculation wrong on 32-bit kernels in the past, we'll add a WARN_ON
> +	 * to check this assertion before returning MAX_LFS_FILESIZE.
> +	 *
> +	 * Avoid integer overflow by comparing the maximum bmbt offset to the
> +	 * maximum pagecache offset in units of fs blocks.
>  	 */
> +	WARN_ON(((1ULL << BMBT_STARTOFF_BITLEN) - 1) <
> +		XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, MAX_LFS_FILESIZE));
>  
> -#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
> -	ASSERT(sizeof(sector_t) == 8);
> -	pagefactor = PAGE_SIZE;
> -	bitshift = BITS_PER_LONG;
> -#endif
> -
> -	return (((uint64_t)pagefactor) << bitshift) - 1;
> +	return MAX_LFS_FILESIZE;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1435,7 +1430,7 @@ xfs_fc_fill_super(
>  	sb->s_magic = XFS_SUPER_MAGIC;
>  	sb->s_blocksize = mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
>  	sb->s_blocksize_bits = ffs(sb->s_blocksize) - 1;
> -	sb->s_maxbytes = xfs_max_file_offset(sb->s_blocksize_bits);
> +	sb->s_maxbytes = xfs_max_file_offset(mp);

The code organization is really weird now.  Just assign MAX_LFS_FILESIZE
to s_maxbytes directly here, and move the WARN_ON right next to it -
preferably as a WARN_ON_ONCE with an actual error return instead of
just warning.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-24  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-22 16:37 [PATCH] xfs: fix s_maxbytes computation on 32-bit kernels Darrick J. Wong
2019-12-24  8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-12-24 16:37   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191224082500.GB26649@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox