From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, hughd@google.com, boris@bur.io, clm@fb.com,
dsterba@suse.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, cem@kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, riel@surriel.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/super: skip non-memcg-aware nr_cached_objects in memcg slab shrink
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 03:17:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714101740.1270419-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d39f8258-66d5-4ce3-8080-69dc4e2ab197@linux.dev>
On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:09:26 +0800 Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev> wrote:
> Hi Usama,
>
> On 7/13/26 11:34 PM, Usama Arif wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 13/07/2026 14:12, Qi Zheng wrote:
> >> Hi Usama,
> >>
> >> On 6/9/26 8:30 PM, Usama Arif wrote:
> >>> The super_block shrinker is registered with SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE because its
> >>> dentry and inode LRUs are memcg-aware (via list_lru). But the optional
> >>> ->nr_cached_objects() hooks that the shrinker also drives are not memcg-aware:
> >>> btrfs extent maps and xfs inode reclaim operate on filesystem-global
> >>> state, and shmem's unused-huge shrinker walks a per-superblock shrinklist.
> >>> None of them filter by sc->memcg.
> >>
> >> This makes sense for now, but how should we handle this if these
> >> shrinkers are made memcg-aware in the future?
> >>
> >> I've recently been working on making the shmem huge shrinker
> >> memcg-aware, but noticed my changes broke after rebasing onto the latest
> >> tree, which led me to this patch.
> >>
> >> As for the shmem huge shrinker, I can work around this limitation by
> >> making it a separate shrinker. But this feels more like an overall
> >> design decision, effectively meaning that all nr_cached_objects are
> >> precluded from being memcg-aware.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Qi
> >>
> >
> >
> > Hi Qi,
> >
> > Thanks for raising this. I think the alternative is what I mentioned in
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cfdb8620-ea55-4226-98bf-d006820e6270@linux.dev/
> > move this down to the fs own callbacks instead of here. Would that
> > be better?
>
> Yes, I think this is a better approach.
>
> Later on, shrinkers that are converted to be memcg-aware can lift this
> restriction themselves.
>
> Thanks,
> Qi
Thanks Qi, I have sent a patch to push it down to filesystems in [1].
No functional change inteneded in there. You would have to rebase your
patch on top of that one and remove my code in shmem specifically.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260714101454.1202449-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Usama
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 12:30 [PATCH] fs/super: skip non-memcg-aware nr_cached_objects in memcg slab shrink Usama Arif
2026-06-09 12:52 ` Jan Kara
2026-06-09 13:38 ` Usama Arif
2026-06-23 10:14 ` Christian Brauner
2026-06-23 18:08 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-06-24 15:18 ` Usama Arif
2026-07-13 13:12 ` Qi Zheng
2026-07-13 15:34 ` Usama Arif
2026-07-14 2:09 ` Qi Zheng
2026-07-14 10:17 ` Usama Arif [this message]
2026-07-14 10:52 ` Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260714101740.1270419-1-usama.arif@linux.dev \
--to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=boris@bur.io \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox