Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] xfs: check split_sectors validity before bio_split call
@ 2026-07-29  7:34 Hongling Zeng
  2026-07-29  8:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hongling Zeng @ 2026-07-29  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cem, djwong, hans.holmberg
  Cc: linux-xfs, linux-kernel, zhongling0719, Hongling Zeng

Change the split_sectors check from !split_sectors to split_sectors <= 0
to make the error handling explicit. While bio_split_rw_at() cannot return
a negative error code for the current GC I/O path (GC I/O doesn't use
REQ_ATOMIC/REQ_NOWAIT flags and has proper alignment), making the check
explicit improves code clarity and makes the intent clear.

This also makes the code more robust for future maintenance if different
I/O patterns are introduced.

Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
---
 Change in v2:
 -Remove Fixes tag as this is not a triggerable bug,suggested by
Christoph Hellwig.
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_zone_gc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_gc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_gc.c
index f76a09130852..e00f4771e424 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_gc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_gc.c
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ xfs_zone_gc_split_write(
 
 	split_sectors = bio_split_rw_at(&chunk->bio, lim, &nsegs,
 			lim->max_zone_append_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT);
-	if (!split_sectors)
+	if (split_sectors <= 0)
 		return NULL;
 
 	/* ensure the split chunk is still block size aligned */
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: check split_sectors validity before bio_split call
  2026-07-29  7:34 [PATCH v2] xfs: check split_sectors validity before bio_split call Hongling Zeng
@ 2026-07-29  8:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-07-29  8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hongling Zeng
  Cc: cem, djwong, hans.holmberg, linux-xfs, linux-kernel,
	zhongling0719

On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 03:34:18PM +0800, Hongling Zeng wrote:
> Change the split_sectors check from !split_sectors to split_sectors <= 0
> to make the error handling explicit. While bio_split_rw_at() cannot return
> a negative error code for the current GC I/O path (GC I/O doesn't use
> REQ_ATOMIC/REQ_NOWAIT flags and has proper alignment), making the check
> explicit improves code clarity and makes the intent clear.
> 
> This also makes the code more robust for future maintenance if different
> I/O patterns are introduced.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>

Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-29  8:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-29  7:34 [PATCH v2] xfs: check split_sectors validity before bio_split call Hongling Zeng
2026-07-29  8:29 ` Christoph Hellwig

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox