In PowerPC's feature, are there any difference between ML410 and ML403?

In PowerPC's feature, are there any difference between ML410 and ML403?

[diak sim]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 452 bytes --]

Hello everyone,

I am using ML410 to port a Linux 2.6 kernel, but init_IRQ() doesn't pass.
Porting Linux 2.6 to ML403 is successful? No such a problem?
In PowerPC's feature, are there any difference between ML410 and ML403?

Thanks.




      ___________________________________________________________ 
雅虎邮箱传递新年祝福，个性贺卡送亲朋！ 
http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/gc/index.html?entry=5&souce=mail_mailletter_tagline

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 623 bytes --]

RE: In PowerPC's feature, are there any difference between ML410 and ML403?

[Stephen Neuendorffer]

There shouldn't be a significant different in the cores themselves, =
however, there are many ways to get the FPGA design slightly wrong where =
it won't boot, or to get the kernel xparameters file out of synch with =
the FPGA design.  This is most likely your problem.

Steve

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+stephen=3Dneuendorffer.name@ozlabs.org =
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-
> bounces+stephen=3Dneuendorffer.name@ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of diak sim
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 5:56 AM
> To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> Subject: In PowerPC's feature,are there any difference between ML410 =
and ML403?
>=20
> Hello everyone,
>=20
> I am using ML410 to port a Linux 2.6 kernel, but init_IRQ() doesn't =
pass.
> Porting Linux 2.6 to ML403 is successful? No such a problem?
> In PowerPC's feature, are there any difference between ML410 and =
ML403?
>=20
> Thanks.
>=20
>=20
> ________________________________
>=20
> =
=D1=C5=BB=A2=D3=CA=CF=E4=B4=AB=B5=DD=D0=C2=C4=EA=D7=A3=B8=A3=A3=AC=B8=F6=D0=
=D4=BA=D8=BF=A8=CB=CD=C7=D7=C5=F3=A3=A1 =
<http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/gc/index.html?entry=3D5&souce=3Dmail_mailletter=
_tagline>