LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: RE: delay programming
@ 2006-05-25  7:10 hangtoo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: hangtoo @ 2006-05-25  7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: li yang-r58472; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 998 bytes --]

hi,
    yes,you are right.the usleep didn't give out accurate delay.so I make a delay funtion to fix it.
   thank you for you help.:)
regards
tony
 


That depends on how accurate you want.  Sleep() functions can't be too accurate 
for Linux schedule characteristic.  To get best accuracy, you can use hardware
timer.  udelay() is a choice which reduces the overall system performance.

Best Regards,
Leo


> -----Original Message-----
> From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com@ozlabs.org
> [mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+leoli=freescale.com@ozlabs.org] On Behalf
> Of tony
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:24 PM
> To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> Subject: delay programming
> 
> 
> hi all
> 	I want to delay 1ms in the program,
> 	does usleep(1000) works accurate?
> 	any good idea?
> 
> regards
> tony
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1839 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-05-25  7:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-25  7:10 RE: delay programming hangtoo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox