LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RFC] tqm8560.dts: add local bus devices
@ 2008-04-06 12:29 Wolfgang Grandegger
       [not found] ` <0d57d42da9d29cc240be9d38de29ed96@kernel.crashing.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2008-04-06 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wg

Hello,

this is my first attempt to add local bus nodes to the DTS file 
of the TQM8560 for the following devices:

  CS1: 128 MB NOR FLASH at 0xf8000000
  CS2: Two Intel 82527 CAN controller at 0xe3000000
  CS3: 128 MB NAND FLASH at 0xe3010000

Index: linux-2.6-denx/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/tqm8560.dts
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-denx.orig/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/tqm8560.dts
+++ linux-2.6-denx/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/tqm8560.dts
@@ -221,6 +221,77 @@
 		};
 	};
 
+	localbus@e0005000 {
+		compatible = "fsl,mpc8560-localbus";
+		#address-cells = <2>;
+		#size-cells = <1>;
+		reg = <0xe0005000 0x100>;	// BRx, ORx, etc.
+
+		ranges = <
+			0x0 0x0 0xfc000000 0x04000000	// NOR FLASH bank 1
+			0x1 0x0 0xf8000000 0x08000000	// NOR FLASH bank 0
+			0x2 0x0 0xe3000000 0x00008000	// CAN (2 x i82527)
+			0x3 0x0 0xe3010000 0x00008000	// NAND FLASH
+		>;
+
+		flash@1,0 {
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <1>;
+			compatible = "cfi-flash";
+			reg = <0x1 0x0 0x8000000>;
+			bank-width = <4>;
+			device-width = <1>;
+
+			partition@0 {
+                                label = "kernel";
+                                reg = <0x00000000 0x00300000>;
+                        };
+                        partition@300000 {
+                                label = "fs";
+                                reg = <0x00300000 0x07c00000>;
+                        };
+                        partition@7700000 {
+                                label = "firmware";
+                                reg = <0x07700000 0x00100000>;
+                                read-only;
+                        };
+
+		};
+
+		can@2,0 {
+			device_type = "can";
+			compatible = "i82527";	// Intel 82527 or Bosch CC770
+			reg = <0x2 0x0 0x100>;
+			interrupts = <0x9 0x2>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
+		}
+
+		can@2,100 {
+			device_type = "can";
+			compatible = "i82527";	// Intel 82527 or Bosch CC770
+			reg = <0x2 0x100 0x100>;
+			interrupts = <0x9 0x2>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
+		}
+
+		nand@3,0 {
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <1>;
+			compatible = "fsl,mpc8560-fcm-nand",
+			             "fsl,elbc-fcm-nand";
+			reg = <0x3 0x0 0x8000>;
+
+			kernel@0 {
+                                label = "kernel";
+				reg = <0x000000 0x0300000>;
+			};
+			fs@300000 {
+                                label = "fs";
+				reg = <0x300000 0x7d00000>;
+			};
+		};
+	};
+
 	pci0: pci@e0008000 {
 		cell-index = <0>;
 		#interrupt-cells = <1>;


Do these entries make sense?

TIA.

Wolfgang.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC] tqm8560.dts: add local bus devices
       [not found] ` <0d57d42da9d29cc240be9d38de29ed96@kernel.crashing.org>
@ 2008-04-06 17:42   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
  2008-04-06 18:45     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2008-04-06 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Segher Boessenkool; +Cc: ppc-dev

Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> +                        partition@300000 {
>> +                                label = "fs";
>> +                                reg = <0x00300000 0x07c00000>;
>> +                        };
>> +                        partition@7700000 {
>> +                                label = "firmware";
>> +                                reg = <0x07700000 0x00100000>;
> 
> These two overlap; should the latter be @7f00000?

Yes, of course.

> 
>> +        can@2,0 {
>> +            device_type = "can";
> 
> No device_type please.

OK, but then I better use a more descriptive name for the compatible
property, e.g.:

	compatible = "can-i82527";	// Intel 82527 or Bosch CC770

> 
>> +        nand@3,0 {
>> +            #address-cells = <1>;
>> +            #size-cells = <1>;
>> +            compatible = "fsl,mpc8560-fcm-nand",
>> +                         "fsl,elbc-fcm-nand";
>> +            reg = <0x3 0x0 0x8000>;
>> +
>> +            kernel@0 {
>> +                                label = "kernel";
>> +                reg = <0x000000 0x0300000>;
>> +            };
>> +            fs@300000 {
>> +                                label = "fs";
>> +                reg = <0x300000 0x7d00000>;
>> +            };
>> +        };
>> +    };
> 
> There should be a node that describes the nand chip between the nand
> controller node and the partition nodes.

I took the mpc8378_*.dts files of 2.6.25-rc8 as example and there is no
such node. Could you point me please to a more appropriate example.

> 
>> Do these entries make sense?
> 
> Looks good otherwise :-)

Thanks.

Wolfgang.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC] tqm8560.dts: add local bus devices
  2008-04-06 17:42   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
@ 2008-04-06 18:45     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2008-04-06 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: ppc-dev

Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> +                        partition@300000 {
>>> +                                label = "fs";
>>> +                                reg = <0x00300000 0x07c00000>;
>>> +                        };
>>> +                        partition@7700000 {
>>> +                                label = "firmware";
>>> +                                reg = <0x07700000 0x00100000>;
>> These two overlap; should the latter be @7f00000?
> 
> Yes, of course.
> 
>>> +        can@2,0 {
>>> +            device_type = "can";
>> No device_type please.
> 
> OK, but then I better use a more descriptive name for the compatible
> property, e.g.:
> 
> 	compatible = "can-i82527";	// Intel 82527 or Bosch CC770
> 
>>> +        nand@3,0 {
>>> +            #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +            #size-cells = <1>;
>>> +            compatible = "fsl,mpc8560-fcm-nand",
>>> +                         "fsl,elbc-fcm-nand";
>>> +            reg = <0x3 0x0 0x8000>;
>>> +
>>> +            kernel@0 {
>>> +                                label = "kernel";
>>> +                reg = <0x000000 0x0300000>;
>>> +            };
>>> +            fs@300000 {
>>> +                                label = "fs";
>>> +                reg = <0x300000 0x7d00000>;
>>> +            };
>>> +        };
>>> +    };
>> There should be a node that describes the nand chip between the nand
>> controller node and the partition nodes.
> 
> I took the mpc8378_*.dts files of 2.6.25-rc8 as example and there is no
> such node. Could you point me please to a more appropriate example.

In the meantime I realized, that the upcoming FSL UPM driver seems to be
appropriate for that board:

  http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-March/052890.html

What is the status of this driver? Are there already some boards using
it (including DTS file)?

Wolfgang.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-06 18:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-06 12:29 [PATCH RFC] tqm8560.dts: add local bus devices Wolfgang Grandegger
     [not found] ` <0d57d42da9d29cc240be9d38de29ed96@kernel.crashing.org>
2008-04-06 17:42   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-04-06 18:45     ` Wolfgang Grandegger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox