From: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
To: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>,
Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>,
Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya <mkchauras@gmail.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Validate arch_compat against host compatibility mode
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:52:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajFAAXoQaWCH2ZA3@Gautams-MacBook-Pro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609053327.61563-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 11:03:27AM +0530, Amit Machhiwal wrote:
> On IBM POWER systems, newer processor generations can operate in
> compatibility modes corresponding to earlier generations. This becomes
> relevant for nested virtualization, where nested KVM guests may need to
> run with a specific processor compatibility level.
>
> Currently, when running a nested KVM guest (L2) inside a Power11 pSeries
> logical partition (L1) booted in Power10 compatibility mode, the guest
> fails to boot while setting 'arch_compat'. This happens because the CPU
> class is derived from the hardware PVR (via mfspr()), which reflects the
> physical processor generation (Power11), rather than the effective
> compatibility mode (Power10).
>
> As a result, userspace may request a Power11 arch_compat for the L2
> guest. However, the L1 partition, running in Power10 compatibility, has
> only negotiated support up to Power10 with the Power Hypervisor (L0).
> When H_GUEST_SET_STATE is invoked with a Power11 Logical PVR, the
> hypervisor rejects the request, leading to a late guest boot failure:
>
> KVM-NESTEDv2: couldn't set guest wide elements
> [..KVM reg dump..]
>
> This situation should be detected earlier and rejected by KVM. Without
> proper validation, if userspace ignores the error, the guest may continue
> to boot in Power11 raw mode on a Power10 compatibility host, which should
> not be allowed.
>
> Introduce a validation mechanism that detects unsupported arch_compat
> values early in the guest initialization path. When an unsupported
> arch_compat is requested (e.g., Power11 on a Power10 compatibility mode
> host), kvmppc_set_arch_compat() uses cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P11_PVR) to
> detect the mismatch and sets arch_compat to PVR_ARCH_INVALID. This
> triggers kvmppc_sanity_check() to mark the vCPU as invalid by setting
> vcpu->arch.sane to false. On the next vCPU run, kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv()
> checks this flag and returns -EINVAL, preventing the guest from running
> with an invalid processor compatibility configuration.
>
> With this, when a Power11 arch_compat is requested on a Power10
> compatibility mode host, the guest fails early during boot with:
>
> error: kvm run failed Invalid argument
>
> This provides a much clearer failure mode compared to the previous
> behavior where the guest could boot in Power11 raw mode (if userspace
> ignored the error) or fail late during H_GUEST_SET_STATE.
>
> Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.13+
> Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> * Fixed null pointer dereference in kvmppc_sanity_check(): added check for
> vcpu->arch.vcore before accessing arch_compat, as vcore is NULL for Book3S
> PR and BookE guests (only Book3S HV uses vcore) [Reported by Sashiko AI]
> * Added Reviewed-by tag from Vaibhav
>
> Changes in v2:
> * Fixed issue where v1 allowed guest to boot in Power11 raw mode when
> userspace ignored the error, by adding validation in kvmppc_sanity_check()
> to ensure early failure during vCPU run [Found the issue after posting v1,
> also reported by Gautam.]
> * Introduced PVR_ARCH_INVALID constant for marking invalid arch_compat
> * Dropped all Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags due to code changes; requesting
> fresh reviews
> * v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260603141539.47620-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
>
> Changes in v1:
> * Moved this patch out of the v3 series [1] as discussed here [2]
> * Addressed below review comments from Ritesh:
> - Based the PVR validation on cpu features
> - Fixed hcall name typo
> - Stable backport
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260522152744.55251-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260522152744.55251-2-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 3449dd2b577d..7472b9522f71 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -1356,6 +1356,7 @@
> #define PVR_ARCH_300 0x0f000005
> #define PVR_ARCH_31 0x0f000006
> #define PVR_ARCH_31_P11 0x0f000007
> +#define PVR_ARCH_INVALID 0xffffffff
>
> /* Macros for setting and retrieving special purpose registers */
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 61dbeea317f3..f9380ef65750 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -446,7 +446,19 @@ static int kvmppc_set_arch_compat(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 arch_compat)
> guest_pcr_bit = PCR_ARCH_300;
> break;
> case PVR_ARCH_31:
> + guest_pcr_bit = PCR_ARCH_31;
> + break;
> case PVR_ARCH_31_P11:
> + /*
> + * Need to check this for ISA 3.1, as Power10 and
> + * Power11 share the same PCR. For any subsequent ISA
> + * versions, this will be taken care of by the guest vs
> + * host PCR comparison below.
> + */
> + if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P11_PVR)) {
> + arch_compat = PVR_ARCH_INVALID;
> + goto out;
> + }
> guest_pcr_bit = PCR_ARCH_31;
> break;
> default:
> @@ -469,6 +481,7 @@ static int kvmppc_set_arch_compat(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 arch_compat)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +out:
> spin_lock(&vc->lock);
> vc->arch_compat = arch_compat;
> kvmhv_nestedv2_mark_dirty(vcpu, KVMPPC_GSID_LOGICAL_PVR);
> @@ -479,7 +492,7 @@ static int kvmppc_set_arch_compat(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 arch_compat)
> vc->pcr = (host_pcr_bit - guest_pcr_bit) | PCR_MASK;
> spin_unlock(&vc->lock);
>
> - return 0;
> + return kvmppc_sanity_check(vcpu);
> }
>
> static void kvmppc_dump_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 00302399fc37..98de68379b18 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -258,6 +258,10 @@ int kvmppc_sanity_check(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (!vcpu->arch.pvr)
> goto out;
>
> + if (vcpu->arch.vcore &&
> + vcpu->arch.vcore->arch_compat == PVR_ARCH_INVALID)
> + goto out;
> +
> /* PAPR only works with book3s_64 */
> if ((vcpu->arch.cpu_type != KVM_CPU_3S_64) && vcpu->arch.papr_enabled)
> goto out;
>
> base-commit: 2d3090a8aeb596a26935db0955d46c9a5db5c6ce
> --
> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
LGTM
Acked-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 5:33 [PATCH v3] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Validate arch_compat against host compatibility mode Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-16 9:47 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-06-16 10:54 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-16 12:08 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-06-16 12:59 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-16 13:09 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-06-16 13:37 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-16 10:19 ` Anushree Mathur
2026-06-16 12:22 ` Gautam Menghani [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajFAAXoQaWCH2ZA3@Gautams-MacBook-Pro.local \
--to=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mkchauras@gmail.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox