From: "Seunghui Lee" <sh043.lee@samsung.com>
To: "'Peter Wang (王信友)'" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
beanhuo@micron.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, storage.sec@samsung.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, bvanassche@acm.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH] UFS: Make TM command timeout configurable from host side
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 16:11:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001dc5791$5f2ea880$1d8bf980$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b83804a8419f0e8cc1a6263144fbaf1583bab2ed.camel@mediatek.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Wang (王信友) <peter.wang@mediatek.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 7:09 PM
> To: beanhuo@micron.com; sh043.lee@samsung.com; avri.altman@wdc.com;
> storage.sec@samsung.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; bvanassche@acm.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> adrian.hunter@intel.com; martin.petersen@oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] UFS: Make TM command timeout configurable from host
> side
>
> On Wed, 2025-11-12 at 08:51 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >
> > Can't we increase the default timeout (TM_CMD_TIMEOUT)? Increasing the
> > default timeout shouldn't affect any configuration negatively, isn't
> > it?
> >
>
> Hi Bart,
>
> In the worst-case scenario (when the device is stuck), it may takes 1.1
> seconds to abort a single task. When the queue is full (64), there will be
> noticeable lag. Aborting all tasks can take over a minute, which is
> unacceptable regardless of whether TM_CMD_TIMEOUT is increased or not.
> Under normal conditions, it’s very unlikely to exceed 100ms. So I think
> directly modifying TM_CMD_TIMEOUT is also acceptable, but I suggest
> keeping it within 500ms.
>
> However, the optimal solution is for the vendor to update the firmware,
> ensuring that TM command priority is set appropriately to prevent
> situations where it exceeds 100ms.
>
> Thanks
> Peter
Hi Mr.Wang,
I understand your concerns about considering the worst-case scenario.
What about directly modifying TM_CMD_TIMEOUT (100ms -> 300ms) and
reducing the TM retry count from 100 to 30?
Please let me know your opinion.
Thank you,
Seunghui Lee.
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum {
#define ADVANCED_RPMB_REQ_TIMEOUT 3000 /* 3 seconds */
/* Task management command timeout */
-#define TM_CMD_TIMEOUT 100 /* msecs */
+#define TM_CMD_TIMEOUT 300 /* msecs */
/* maximum number of retries for a general UIC command */
#define UFS_UIC_COMMAND_RETRIES 3
@@ -7663,7 +7663,7 @@ int ufshcd_try_to_abort_task(struct ufs_hba *hba, int tag)
int poll_cnt;
u8 resp = 0xF;
- for (poll_cnt = 100; poll_cnt; poll_cnt--) {
+ for (poll_cnt = 30; poll_cnt; poll_cnt--) {
err = ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(hba, lrbp->lun, lrbp->task_tag,
UFS_QUERY_TASK, &resp);
if (!err && resp == UPIU_TASK_MANAGEMENT_FUNC_SUCCEEDED) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20251106012702epcas1p28fdeed020ea44f18dcc751c283fbbcc2@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-11-06 1:26 ` [PATCH] UFS: Make TM command timeout configurable from host side Seunghui Lee
2025-11-11 2:46 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-11 8:44 ` Seunghui Lee
2025-11-11 9:03 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-11 16:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-12 2:58 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-12 8:49 ` Seunghui Lee
2025-11-12 9:42 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-12 16:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-13 10:08 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-17 7:11 ` Seunghui Lee [this message]
2025-11-17 8:40 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-17 9:48 ` Seunghui Lee
2025-11-18 5:48 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-17 16:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-18 5:55 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-18 17:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-19 9:20 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-17 16:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-18 5:52 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-11 16:38 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000001dc5791$5f2ea880$1d8bf980$@samsung.com' \
--to=sh043.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=storage.sec@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox